Azure Container Instances vs Azure Kubernetes Service: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Deployment Model: Azure Container Instances (ACI) is suitable for scenarios that require a single container or where fast deployment is crucial, whereas Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed for more complex applications that need orchestration and scaling of multiple containers.

2. Orchestration: ACI does not offer native support for container orchestration, making it less suitable for managing clusters of containers. On the other hand, AKS leverages Kubernetes for container orchestration, allowing for automated deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.

3. Resource Management: ACI provides more granular control over the resources allocated to individual containers, whereas AKS operates at the cluster level, managing resources for multiple containers collectively.

4. Scalability: AKS offers built-in features for horizontal scaling and load balancing across containers, making it a preferred choice for applications that require autoscaling based on demand. ACI, on the other hand, is more suited for static workloads that do not require frequent scaling.

5. Cost: While ACI offers more cost-effective pricing for individual container instances, AKS may be more economical for applications with a large number of containers due to its optimized resource management and scaling capabilities.

6. Service Level Agreements: AKS comes with a guaranteed SLA of 99.95% for the Kubernetes API server, whereas ACI does not have a specific SLA for container management. This difference can be crucial for applications with stringent availability requirements.

In Summary, Azure Container Instances are ideal for simple, single-container deployments with fast deployment needs, while Azure Kubernetes Service is better suited for complex applications requiring orchestration, scaling, and reliability through Kubernetes.