StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure DevOps vs Jenkins

Azure DevOps vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.9K
Votes249

Azure DevOps vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Azure DevOps and Jenkins are two popular tools used for automated software development and deployment. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. Let's discuss the key differences between them.

  1. Integration with Microsoft Tools and Services: Azure DevOps is tightly integrated with various Microsoft tools and services, such as Azure cloud services, Visual Studio, and Active Directory. This allows seamless collaboration and integration within the Microsoft ecosystem. On the other hand, Jenkins is a more flexible tool and can integrate with a wide range of third-party tools and services, making it suitable for diverse development environments.

  2. Deployment Options: Azure DevOps provides a cloud-based solution, allowing users to host and manage their pipelines and repositories on the Azure platform. It also provides built-in support for deploying applications to Azure cloud services. In contrast, Jenkins offers more deployment flexibility as it can be installed on-premises or in any cloud environment. This makes Jenkins a preferred choice for organizations that require complete control over their infrastructure and deployment pipelines.

  3. Out-of-the-box Functionality: Azure DevOps offers a comprehensive set of integrated features, including version control, continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), and testing tools. These features are readily available and do not require extensive configuration. Jenkins, on the other hand, provides a more customizable approach, allowing users to define and configure their own CI/CD pipelines using plugins. This flexibility gives users more control over the pipeline setup but also requires more time and effort for initial setup and maintenance.

  4. Ease of Use: Azure DevOps provides a user-friendly web-based interface, making it relatively easy to set up and use. It provides a step-by-step guided experience for creating pipelines and managing projects. Jenkins, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with its configuration and scripting concepts. While Jenkins provides a powerful and flexible platform, it requires a higher level of technical expertise to set up and maintain.

  5. Scalability: Azure DevOps is designed to scale seamlessly, allowing users to handle large projects and distributed teams with ease. It provides features like parallel execution, agent pools, and scalability in the cloud. Jenkins can also handle large-scale projects, but it requires more manual configuration and management to ensure optimal performance. Users need to set up their own distributed build infrastructure and manage resources effectively to achieve scalability in Jenkins.

  6. Pricing Model: Azure DevOps offers different pricing options, including a free tier for small teams and pay-as-you-go plans for larger organizations. It provides transparent pricing based on the number of users and usage. Jenkins, on the other hand, is an open-source tool that is free to use. However, organizations using Jenkins need to invest in infrastructure, maintenance, and support, which can add to the overall cost.

In summary, Azure DevOps provides seamless integration with Microsoft tools and services, offers a cloud-based deployment option, and has out-of-the-box functionality with a user-friendly interface. On the other hand, Jenkins offers more flexibility, customizable pipelines, ease of scalability, and a free pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Azure DevOps

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards; Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI; Git: free private repositories, pull requests; Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics; Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux; Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing; Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails; Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products; Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages; IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio; Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
50.4K
Followers
2.9K
Votes
2.2K
Votes
249
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 56
    Complete and powerful
  • 32
    Huge extension ecosystem
  • 27
    Azure integration
  • 26
    One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI
  • 26
    Flexible and powerful
Cons
  • 8
    Still dependant on C# for agents
  • 5
    Half Baked
  • 5
    Many in devops disregard MS altogether
  • 4
    Jack of all trades, master of none
  • 4
    Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Docker
Docker
Slack
Slack
Trello
Trello
Git
Git
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Eclipse
Eclipse
Tower
Tower

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Azure DevOps?

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana