StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Azure Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Azure Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes75
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.3K
Followers787
Votes52

Azure Storage vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Azure Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Azure Storage and Google Cloud Storage are two popular cloud storage solutions that offer a range of features and functionalities. While they both provide object storage services, there are key differences between the two offerings.

  1. Scalability: Azure Storage offers unlimited scalability, allowing users to store and retrieve massive amounts of data without any limitations. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage has a scalability limit, which means users may need to manage data across different buckets for larger datasets.

  2. Pricing: Azure Storage and Google Cloud Storage have different pricing models. Azure Storage offers tiered pricing based on the storage capacity utilized, while Google Cloud Storage follows a more granular pricing model based on the data storage, operations performed, and network egress costs. Users should carefully compare the pricing structures to determine the most cost-effective solution for their needs.

  3. Integration: Azure Storage seamlessly integrates with other Azure services, such as Azure VMs or Azure Functions, allowing for easy data exchange and processing. Google Cloud Storage provides similar integration capabilities with other Google Cloud services, such as BigQuery or Google Compute Engine. The choice between the two would depend on the specific ecosystem and services being utilized.

  4. Data Transfer Options: Azure Storage offers various data transfer options, including Azure Data Box, Data Box Disk, and Azure Data Factory, which facilitate offline and online data transfers. Google Cloud Storage offers similar offline data transfer options, such as Transfer Appliance or Transfer Service, to securely and efficiently move large volumes of data. Users should evaluate the available data transfer options based on their specific requirements.

  5. Data Redundancy: Azure Storage ensures data durability by replicating data within the same data center and asynchronously to a secondary data center in the same region. Google Cloud Storage follows a similar approach by replicating data within the same region and asynchronously to another region. The choice between the two would depend on the desired level of redundancy and disaster recovery capabilities.

  6. Access Control: Azure Storage provides access control mechanisms through Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) integration, allowing granular control and authentication of users accessing the storage resources. Google Cloud Storage offers similar access control capabilities through Google Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM). The choice between the two would depend on the preferred identity and access management solution utilized by the organization.

In summary, Azure Storage and Google Cloud Storage differ in their scalability, pricing models, integration capabilities, data transfer options, data redundancy strategies, and access control mechanisms. Organizations should consider these factors when choosing a cloud storage solution that best fits their requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, Azure Storage

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Azure Storage
Azure Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing
Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
Statistics
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
787
Votes
75
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 19
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
  • 2
    Cost-effective
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
Integrations
No integrations available
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, Azure Storage?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase