StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Backpack vs Laravel Nova

Backpack vs Laravel Nova

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backpack
Backpack
Stacks14
Followers67
Votes14
Laravel Nova
Laravel Nova
Stacks107
Followers178
Votes0

Backpack vs Laravel Nova: What are the differences?

Introduction: Backpack and Laravel Nova are two popular administration panels built for Laravel. They both provide a user-friendly interface to manage the backend of Laravel applications. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Customizability: Backpack offers a higher level of customizability compared to Laravel Nova. With Backpack, you have full control over the code and can easily modify it to fit your specific project requirements. On the other hand, Laravel Nova uses a more opinionated approach and restricts customization to a certain extent.

  2. Pricing and Licensing: Backpack has a freemium model, where you can choose between a free version with limited features or a paid version with additional functionalities. On the other hand, Laravel Nova is a paid product and requires a license for commercial usage.

  3. Extensions and Add-ons: Backpack has a wide range of community-contributed extensions and add-ons available to enhance its functionality. These extensions can be easily integrated into your project, providing additional features and capabilities. In contrast, Laravel Nova has a smaller ecosystem of extensions and add-ons available.

  4. Documentation and Support: Backpack has an extensive and well-documented user guide, along with an active community forum where you can seek assistance from other users. Additionally, Backpack offers email support for paid users. On the other hand, Laravel Nova has official documentation and support provided by the Laravel team, ensuring reliable support for any issues.

  5. UI/UX Design: Backpack focuses on providing a highly customizable and flexible user interface, allowing you to design the backend according to your specific needs. You can easily modify the layout, components, and overall design aesthetics. In contrast, Laravel Nova follows a more standardized and opinionated UI/UX design, which may be preferred by users looking for a consistent user experience.

  6. Maturity and Stability: Backpack has been around for a longer time and has a more established user base. It has been actively developed and maintained, ensuring a stable and reliable platform. On the other hand, Laravel Nova is a newer product but benefits from being backed by the Laravel ecosystem, known for its reliability and stability.

In summary, Backpack offers more customizability, a freemium pricing model, a larger ecosystem of extensions, and a highly customizable UI/UX design. Laravel Nova, on the other hand, provides a more opinionated approach, official Laravel support, a standardized UI/UX design, and the backing of the Laravel ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Backpack
Backpack
Laravel Nova
Laravel Nova

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

It is a beautifully designed administration panel for Laravel. Carefully crafted by the creators of Laravel to make you the most productive developer. It provides a full CRUD interface for your Eloquent models. Every type of Eloquent relationship is fully supported.

-
Code Driven Configuration; full CRUD interface for your Eloquent models; integrated with Laravel’s existing authorization policies
Statistics
Stacks
14
Stacks
107
Followers
67
Followers
178
Votes
14
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Great docs
  • 4
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Zero-config
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
ES6
ES6
JavaScript
JavaScript
Webpack
Webpack
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Vue.js
Vue.js
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Backpack, Laravel Nova?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

PrimeNg

PrimeNg

It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.

Structor

Structor

Structor is a visual development environment for node.js Web applications with React UI. The essential part of the builder is a project boilerplate. The boilerplate is a prepacked source code of node.js application in which metainfo included.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot