StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs GitLab CI

Bamboo vs GitLab CI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.6K
Votes75
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Bamboo vs GitLab CI: What are the differences?

Key differences between Bamboo and GitLab CI

Bamboo and GitLab CI are both popular continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) tools used in software development. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration: Bamboo is tightly integrated with Jira and other Atlassian tools, making it an attractive choice for teams already using Atlassian's product suite. GitLab CI, on the other hand, is part of the GitLab platform, providing seamless integration with GitLab's version control system.

  2. Ease of Use: Bamboo offers a user-friendly interface and is relatively easy to set up, making it suitable for teams with limited technical expertise. GitLab CI, while also user-friendly, offers a more powerful and flexible configuration using a YAML-based file, allowing greater customization and fine-tuning.

  3. Scalability: Bamboo is designed for small to medium-sized teams and may face scalability limitations when dealing with larger projects or increased workload. GitLab CI, being part of the GitLab platform, is built to handle larger projects and distributed teams, making it a better choice for organizations with growing needs.

  4. Pricing: Bamboo is a commercial product that requires a license, making it more suitable for organizations with a budget for software tools. GitLab CI, on the other hand, is an open-source solution available for free, which can be beneficial for smaller teams or those with cost constraints.

  5. Extensibility: Bamboo offers a range of plugins and integrations to extend its functionality, allowing teams to connect with other development tools and services. GitLab CI also provides a wide range of integrations, but its open-source nature allows for greater customization and additional community-led extensions.

  6. Community Support: GitLab CI benefits from a strong and active community, providing regular updates, bug fixes, and support. Bamboo, being a commercial product, relies on Atlassian's support channels, which may not have the same level of community engagement.

In summary, Bamboo provides seamless integration with Atlassian's suite of tools, is easy to set up, and suitable for small to medium-sized teams. GitLab CI, along with its strong integration with GitLab, offers more scalability, customization options, and a stronger community support network.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bamboo, GitLab CI

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 14, 2020

Decided

Buddy is one of the most easy-to-use tools for CI I ever met. When I needed to set up the pipeline I was really impressed with how easy it is to create it with Buddy with only a few moments. It's literally like:

  1. Add repo
  2. Click - Click - Click
  3. You're done and your app is on prod :D The top feature that I've found is a simple integration with different notification channels - not only Slack (which is the one by default), but Telegram and Discord. The support is also neat - guys respond pretty quickly on even a small issue.
157k views157k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
GitLab CI
GitLab CI

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
504
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
549
Followers
1.6K
Votes
17
Votes
75
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Low community support
Pros
  • 22
    Robust CI with awesome Docker support
  • 13
    Simple configuration
  • 9
    All in one solution
  • 7
    Source Control and CI in one place
  • 5
    Free and open source
Cons
  • 2
    Works best with GitLab repositories
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
GitLab
GitLab

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, GitLab CI?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana