StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs Jenkins vs Travis CI

Bamboo vs Jenkins vs Travis CI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Travis CI
Travis CI
Stacks28.0K
Followers6.7K
Votes1.7K
Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17

Bamboo vs Jenkins vs Travis CI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) tools, Bamboo, Jenkins, and Travis CI are popular choices. Each tool offers unique features and benefits, making it essential to understand the key differences between them for selecting the most suitable tool for specific software development needs.

  1. Pipeline Visualization: Bamboo has an intuitive and user-friendly interface that provides detailed pipeline visualization, making it easier for users to track and understand the flow of their CI/CD processes. In comparison, Jenkins and Travis CI lack such robust pipeline visualization capabilities, requiring users to navigate through complex log files for insights.

  2. Ease of Configuration: Bamboo offers a more streamlined and straightforward setup process, allowing users to quickly configure their CI/CD pipelines without extensive scripting or coding. On the other hand, Jenkins and Travis CI often require users to write intricate configuration scripts, leading to a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  3. Integration with Atlassian Ecosystem: Bamboo seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products such as Jira and Bitbucket, facilitating smoother collaboration and efficiency within teams using the Atlassian ecosystem. In contrast, Jenkins and Travis CI may require additional plugins or configurations to achieve similar levels of integration with Atlassian tools.

  4. Control and Flexibility: Jenkins provides unparalleled control and flexibility through its extensive plugin ecosystem, allowing users to customize and extend the tool's functionality according to their specific requirements. While Bamboo and Travis CI also offer plugin support, Jenkins' vast repository of plugins offers a more extensive range of options for customization and automation.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: Jenkins boasts a large and active community of users and developers, ensuring a wealth of resources, tutorials, and documentation for troubleshooting and optimizing CI/CD pipelines. Although Bamboo and Travis CI also have dedicated user communities, the vast user base of Jenkins often results in quicker responses to queries and challenges faced by users.

  6. Pricing Models: Bamboo follows a licensing model based on the number of build agents, making it a more suitable choice for organizations with predictable scaling needs and budget constraints. In contrast, Jenkins and Travis CI offer free and open-source versions, with Jenkins providing more cost-effective options for organizations that require extensive scaling and multiple build pipelines.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Bamboo, Jenkins, and Travis CI in terms of pipeline visualization, ease of configuration, integration with Atlassian ecosystem, control and flexibility, community support, and pricing models is crucial for selecting the most appropriate CI/CD tool for your software development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Travis CI, Jenkins, Bamboo

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bamboo
Bamboo

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

Easy Setup- Getting started with Travis CI is as easy as enabling a project, adding basic build instructions to your project and committing code.;Supports Your Platform- Lots of databases and services are pre-installed and can simply be enabled in your build configuration, we'll launch them for you automatically. MySQL, PostgreSQL, ElasticSearch, Redis, Riak, RabbitMQ, Memcached are available by default.;Deploy With Confidence- Deploying to production after a successful build is as easy as setting up a bit of configuration, and we'll deploy your code to Heroku, Engine Yard Cloud, Nodejitsu, cloudControl, OpenShift, and CloudFoundry.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
28.0K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
504
Followers
6.7K
Followers
50.4K
Followers
549
Votes
1.7K
Votes
2.2K
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 506
    Github integration
  • 388
    Free for open source
  • 271
    Easy to get started
  • 191
    Nice interface
  • 162
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 8
    Can't be hosted insternally
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 3
    Feature lacking
  • 2
    Incomplete documentation for all platforms
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Low community support
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Heroku
Heroku
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
MySQL
MySQL
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Nodejitsu
Nodejitsu
npm
npm
GitHub
GitHub
Engine Yard Cloud
Engine Yard Cloud
cloudControl
cloudControl
No integrations available
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat

What are some alternatives to Travis CI, Jenkins, Bamboo?

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana