Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BBEdit vs Emacs: What are the differences?
BBEdit vs Emacs
BBEdit and Emacs are popular text editors that offer various features and functionalities for developers and programmers. While both editors serve the purpose of editing and manipulating text, there are key differences that set them apart.
Ease of Use: BBEdit is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easier for beginners to navigate and use. On the other hand, Emacs has a steeper learning curve and requires some time to master its extensive set of commands.
Customization: Emacs is highly customizable, allowing users to tailor the editor to their specific needs. With its built-in scripting language, Emacs can be extended and customized extensively. BBEdit, although it offers some customization options, does not provide the same level of flexibility and extensibility as Emacs.
Package Ecosystem: Emacs has a vast package ecosystem called Emacs Lisp Package Archive (ELPA), which provides a wide range of plugins and packages developed by its active community. This extensive selection of packages allows users to enhance Emacs with additional features and functionalities. BBEdit, while it does have a collection of plugins, does not have a comparable package ecosystem.
Platform Compatibility: BBEdit is exclusively available for macOS, making it a popular choice for users within the Apple ecosystem. Emacs, on the other hand, is platform-independent and available on multiple operating systems, including macOS, Linux, and Windows.
Integration with Other Tools: BBEdit integrates seamlessly with other macOS applications and tools, making it convenient for developers working within the Apple ecosystem. Emacs, with its extensive range of modes and features, can integrate with external tools for various programming languages and development workflows.
Performance: BBEdit is known for its performance and stability, providing a smooth editing experience even with large files. Emacs, while highly powerful and feature-rich, may experience performance issues when handling extremely large files or complex tasks due to its extensive feature set and customization options.
In summary, while both BBEdit and Emacs serve as powerful text editors, they differ in terms of ease of use, customization options, package ecosystems, platform compatibility, integration capabilities, and performance. Users looking for a simpler and more beginner-friendly experience may lean towards BBEdit, while those seeking extensive customization and a vibrant community may prefer Emacs.
Pros of BBEdit
- Support for character encodings and file formats1
- Flexible project file management1
- Snippets functionality includes substitutions1
- Highly extensible (plugins, text filters, etc)1
- Superb regex find/replace1
Pros of Emacs
- Vast array of extensions65
- Have all you can imagine44
- Everything i need in one place40
- Portability39
- Customer config32
- Your config works on any platform16
- Low memory consumption13
- Perfect for monsters11
- All life inside one program10
- Extendable, portable, fast - all at your fingertips8
- Enables extremely rapid keyboard-only navigation6
- Widely-used keybindings (e.g. by bash)5
- Extensible in Lisp5
- Runs everywhere important5
- FOSS Software4
- Powerful multilanguage IDE4
- Git integration4
- May be old but always reliable4
- Asynchronous3
- Powerful UI3
- Huge ecosystem1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BBEdit
Cons of Emacs
- So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked4
- Hard to learn for beginners4
- Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux1