StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs behave

Cucumber vs behave

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36
behave
behave
Stacks67
Followers119
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks656

Cucumber vs behave: What are the differences?

Cucumber and Behave are both popular testing frameworks used for behavior-driven development (BDD) in software testing. Let's explore the key differences between Cucumber and Behave.

  1. Language Support: Cucumber is primarily used with Ruby, but it also has support for other programming languages like Java and JavaScript. On the other hand, Behave is specifically designed for Python, making it a suitable choice for Python developers.

  2. Syntax Differences: Cucumber uses a Gherkin syntax, which is a human-readable language with keywords like "Given," "When," and "Then" to define test steps. Behave, on the other hand, uses a more Pythonic syntax with keywords like "Given," "When," "Then," "And," and "But." This syntax difference makes Cucumber more accessible to non-developers, while Behave aligns well with Python developers.

  3. Integration with Test Automation Tools: Cucumber provides native integration with various test automation tools like Selenium WebDriver, allowing testers to easily automate their test scenarios. Behave, on the other hand, can integrate with Python-based test automation tools like Pytest and Robot Framework. The choice of integration depends on the testing ecosystem and tools preferred by the team.

  4. Reporting Capabilities: Cucumber has robust reporting capabilities, providing detailed reports in HTML and other formats. It generates reports with information like test results, test coverage, and statistics. Behave, however, provides limited built-in reporting features. Testers using Behave may need to rely on third-party reporting tools or custom development for advanced reporting requirements.

  5. Community & Ecosystem: Cucumber has a more extensive and mature community compared to Behave. This means that Cucumber has more available resources, plugins, and support from the community. Behave, being Python-specific, has a smaller community, but it still benefits from the popularity and vast ecosystem of Python.

  6. Documentation and Learning Resources: Cucumber has been around for a longer time and has well-documented resources, tutorials, and examples available, making it easier for beginners to get started. Behave, being a more recent addition, may have fewer learning resources and examples available, making it slightly more challenging for newcomers to grasp.

In summary, Cucumber and Behave differ in language support, syntax, integration with automation tools, reporting capabilities, community support, and available learning resources. The choice between these frameworks depends on factors such as preferred programming language, ecosystem, reporting requirements, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
behave
behave

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

It is behaviour-driven development, Python style. It uses tests written in a natural language style, backed up by Python code.

-
bdd; tests; tdd
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
656
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
67
Followers
927
Followers
119
Votes
36
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Django
Django
Flask
Flask

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, behave?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana