Bitbucket vs Crucible: What are the differences?
What is Bitbucket? One place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private repositories. Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
What is Crucible? Review code, discuss changes, share knowledge, and identify defects. Review code, discuss changes, share knowledge, and identify defects with Crucible's flexible review workflow. It's code review made easy for Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and more.
Bitbucket can be classified as a tool in the "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category, while Crucible is grouped under "Code Review".
Some of the features offered by Bitbucket are:
- Unlimited private repositories, charged per user
- Best-in-class Jira integration
- Built-in CI/CD
On the other hand, Crucible provides the following key features:
- Workflow-based reviews
- Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets
- Create reviews from the command line
"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider Bitbucket over the competitors, whereas "JIRA Integration" was stated as the key factor in picking Crucible.
PayPal, Salesforce, and Starbucks are some of the popular companies that use Bitbucket, whereas Crucible is used by Eyereturn Marketing, Scientific Learning, and qcue. Bitbucket has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1735 company stacks & 1449 developers stacks; compared to Crucible, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but
git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Bitbucket?
What is Crucible?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions