Bitbucket vs Docker

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Bitbucket vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, there are various tools and technologies used to optimize the development process. Two popular tools in this domain are Bitbucket and Docker. Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service while Docker is an open-source platform used for automating the deployment and scaling of applications. Although both tools cater to different aspects of software development, they share some similarities as well as distinct differences.

Architecture: Bitbucket is primarily used for managing and versioning source code repositories, offering features like pull requests, issue tracking, and code reviews. On the other hand, Docker is primarily focused on containerization, allowing developers to package their applications along with dependencies into portable and lightweight containers. While Bitbucket provides a platform for collaboration and version control, Docker is more concerned with the runtime environment and ensuring consistent application deployment.
Functionality: Bitbucket provides tools for project management, code collaboration, and integration with other popular software development platforms like Jira and Trello. It offers features such as continuous integration and deployment through its integration with CI/CD tools. Docker, on the other hand, provides a platform for building, packaging, and distributing applications using containers. It allows for easy deployment and scalability, providing a consistent and reproducible environment for applications to run.
Workflow: Bitbucket follows a traditional workflow for software development, where developers push their changes to a central repository, create branches for different features, and collaborate through pull requests and code reviews. Docker, on the other hand, introduces a new paradigm of containerization, where applications are packaged along with their dependencies and can be run in any environment that supports Docker. It brings a more modular and portable approach to development and deployment.
Scalability: Bitbucket is primarily designed for collaboration and version control, making it suitable for small to medium-sized development teams. It provides features to manage code repositories and facilitates efficient collaboration among developers. Docker, on the other hand, excels in enabling scalability through containerization. It allows applications to be deployed in a consistent and reproducible manner across different environments, making it ideal for container-based deployments and microservices architecture.
Flexibility and Portability: Bitbucket supports various version control systems like Git and Mercurial, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred VCS. It also offers integrations with other tools and platforms, making it a versatile solution for version control and collaboration in software development. Docker, on the other hand, provides a platform-independent approach to application deployment. It allows developers to create containerized applications that can run on any system with Docker support, ensuring portability and eliminating system-specific dependencies.
Deployment and Infrastructure Management: Bitbucket, being a repository hosting service, focuses on managing the codebase and collaboration aspects of software development. While it offers integration with CI/CD tools for automated deployments, it does not provide infrastructure management capabilities. Docker, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive solution for application deployment and infrastructure management. It includes tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes for orchestrating containerized applications and managing the underlying infrastructure.

In summary, Bitbucket and Docker cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle. Bitbucket serves as a version control and collaboration platform, while Docker focuses on containerization and portable application deployment. Therefore, the key differences between Bitbucket and Docker lie in their architecture, functionality, workflow, scalability, flexibility, and deployment capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Docker

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Docker
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 194.2K
Followers 33.4K	Followers 143.8K
Votes 2.8K	Votes 3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Jira Codeship	Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Docker?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction

Architecture: Bitbucket is primarily used for managing and versioning source code repositories, offering features like pull requests, issue tracking, and code reviews. On the other hand, Docker is primarily focused on containerization, allowing developers to package their applications along with dependencies into portable and lightweight containers. While Bitbucket provides a platform for collaboration and version control, Docker is more concerned with the runtime environment and ensuring consistent application deployment.
Functionality: Bitbucket provides tools for project management, code collaboration, and integration with other popular software development platforms like Jira and Trello. It offers features such as continuous integration and deployment through its integration with CI/CD tools. Docker, on the other hand, provides a platform for building, packaging, and distributing applications using containers. It allows for easy deployment and scalability, providing a consistent and reproducible environment for applications to run.
Workflow: Bitbucket follows a traditional workflow for software development, where developers push their changes to a central repository, create branches for different features, and collaborate through pull requests and code reviews. Docker, on the other hand, introduces a new paradigm of containerization, where applications are packaged along with their dependencies and can be run in any environment that supports Docker. It brings a more modular and portable approach to development and deployment.
Scalability: Bitbucket is primarily designed for collaboration and version control, making it suitable for small to medium-sized development teams. It provides features to manage code repositories and facilitates efficient collaboration among developers. Docker, on the other hand, excels in enabling scalability through containerization. It allows applications to be deployed in a consistent and reproducible manner across different environments, making it ideal for container-based deployments and microservices architecture.
Flexibility and Portability: Bitbucket supports various version control systems like Git and Mercurial, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred VCS. It also offers integrations with other tools and platforms, making it a versatile solution for version control and collaboration in software development. Docker, on the other hand, provides a platform-independent approach to application deployment. It allows developers to create containerized applications that can run on any system with Docker support, ensuring portability and eliminating system-specific dependencies.
Deployment and Infrastructure Management: Bitbucket, being a repository hosting service, focuses on managing the codebase and collaboration aspects of software development. While it offers integration with CI/CD tools for automated deployments, it does not provide infrastructure management capabilities. Docker, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive solution for application deployment and infrastructure management. It includes tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes for orchestrating containerized applications and managing the underlying infrastructure.

Bitbucket vs Docker

Overview