Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bitbucket

40.5K
32.7K
+ 1
2.8K
Docker

174.4K
140.1K
+ 1
3.9K
Add tool

Bitbucket vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, there are various tools and technologies used to optimize the development process. Two popular tools in this domain are Bitbucket and Docker. Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service while Docker is an open-source platform used for automating the deployment and scaling of applications. Although both tools cater to different aspects of software development, they share some similarities as well as distinct differences.

  1. Architecture: Bitbucket is primarily used for managing and versioning source code repositories, offering features like pull requests, issue tracking, and code reviews. On the other hand, Docker is primarily focused on containerization, allowing developers to package their applications along with dependencies into portable and lightweight containers. While Bitbucket provides a platform for collaboration and version control, Docker is more concerned with the runtime environment and ensuring consistent application deployment.

  2. Functionality: Bitbucket provides tools for project management, code collaboration, and integration with other popular software development platforms like Jira and Trello. It offers features such as continuous integration and deployment through its integration with CI/CD tools. Docker, on the other hand, provides a platform for building, packaging, and distributing applications using containers. It allows for easy deployment and scalability, providing a consistent and reproducible environment for applications to run.

  3. Workflow: Bitbucket follows a traditional workflow for software development, where developers push their changes to a central repository, create branches for different features, and collaborate through pull requests and code reviews. Docker, on the other hand, introduces a new paradigm of containerization, where applications are packaged along with their dependencies and can be run in any environment that supports Docker. It brings a more modular and portable approach to development and deployment.

  4. Scalability: Bitbucket is primarily designed for collaboration and version control, making it suitable for small to medium-sized development teams. It provides features to manage code repositories and facilitates efficient collaboration among developers. Docker, on the other hand, excels in enabling scalability through containerization. It allows applications to be deployed in a consistent and reproducible manner across different environments, making it ideal for container-based deployments and microservices architecture.

  5. Flexibility and Portability: Bitbucket supports various version control systems like Git and Mercurial, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred VCS. It also offers integrations with other tools and platforms, making it a versatile solution for version control and collaboration in software development. Docker, on the other hand, provides a platform-independent approach to application deployment. It allows developers to create containerized applications that can run on any system with Docker support, ensuring portability and eliminating system-specific dependencies.

  6. Deployment and Infrastructure Management: Bitbucket, being a repository hosting service, focuses on managing the codebase and collaboration aspects of software development. While it offers integration with CI/CD tools for automated deployments, it does not provide infrastructure management capabilities. Docker, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive solution for application deployment and infrastructure management. It includes tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes for orchestrating containerized applications and managing the underlying infrastructure.

In summary, Bitbucket and Docker cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle. Bitbucket serves as a version control and collaboration platform, while Docker focuses on containerization and portable application deployment. Therefore, the key differences between Bitbucket and Docker lie in their architecture, functionality, workflow, scalability, flexibility, and deployment capabilities.

Decisions about Bitbucket and Docker
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 454.2K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Bitbucket
Pros of Docker
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
  • 123
    Integrates with many apis and services
  • 119
    Reliable uptime
  • 87
    Nice gui
  • 85
    Pull requests and code reviews
  • 58
    Very customisable
  • 16
    Mercurial repositories
  • 14
    SourceTree integration
  • 12
    JIRA integration
  • 10
    Track every commit to an issue in JIRA
  • 8
    Deployment hooks
  • 8
    Best free alternative to Github
  • 7
    Automatically share repositories with all your teammates
  • 7
    Source Code Insight
  • 7
    Compatible with Mac and Windows
  • 6
    Price
  • 5
    Login with Google
  • 5
    Create a wiki
  • 5
    Approve pull request button
  • 4
    Customizable pipelines
  • 4
    #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA
  • 3
    Unlimited Private Repos at no cost
  • 3
    Also supports Mercurial
  • 3
    Continuous Integration and Delivery
  • 2
    Mercurial Support
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    Teamcity
  • 2
    Open source friendly
  • 2
    Issues tracker
  • 2
    IAM
  • 2
    Academic license program
  • 2
    IAM integration
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
  • 218
    Standardization
  • 185
    Scalable
  • 106
    Upgrading / down­grad­ing / ap­pli­ca­tion versions
  • 88
    Security
  • 85
    Private paas environments
  • 34
    Portability
  • 26
    Limit resource usage
  • 17
    Game changer
  • 16
    I love the way docker has changed virtualization
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    Concurrency
  • 8
    Docker's Compose tools
  • 6
    Fast and Portable
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 5
    Because its fun
  • 4
    Makes shipping to production very simple
  • 3
    It's dope
  • 3
    Highly useful
  • 2
    Does a nice job hogging memory
  • 2
    Open source and highly configurable
  • 2
    Simplicity, isolation, resource effective
  • 2
    MacOS support FAKE
  • 2
    Its cool
  • 2
    Docker hub for the FTW
  • 2
    HIgh Throughput
  • 2
    Very easy to setup integrate and build
  • 2
    Package the environment with the application
  • 2
    Super
  • 0
    Asdfd

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Bitbucket
Cons of Docker
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
  • 7
    Complexity with rights management
  • 6
    Only 5 collaborators for private repos
  • 4
    Slow performance
  • 2
    No AWS Codepipelines integration
  • 1
    No more Mercurial repositories
  • 1
    No server side git-hook support
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Bitbucket?

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

What is Docker?

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Bitbucket?
What companies use Docker?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Bitbucket?
What tools integrate with Docker?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

PythonDockerKubernetes+7
3
1155
Mar 4 2020 at 5:14PM

Atlassian

GitBitbucketWindows+4
3
1160
PythonDockerKubernetes+14
12
2653
Jul 9 2019 at 7:22PM

Blue Medora

DockerPostgreSQLNew Relic+8
11
2374
DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
6
2758
What are some alternatives to Bitbucket and Docker?
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
Atlassian Stash
It is a centralized solution to manage Git repositories behind the firewall. Streamlined for small agile teams, powerful enough for large organizations.
Crucible
It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
See all alternatives