Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bitrise

337
369
+ 1
74
Codemagic

51
55
+ 1
17
Add tool

Bitrise vs CodeMagic: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bitrise and CodeMagic are two popular CI/CD platforms that offer automated build, test, and deployment solutions for mobile app development projects. While both platforms aim to streamline the development process, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Platform Customizability: Bitrise offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor their CI/CD workflows by choosing from a wide range of available steps and integrations. On the other hand, CodeMagic focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a more opinionated approach with pre-configured workflows that are optimized specifically for Flutter projects.

  2. Supported Platforms: Bitrise supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, web, macOS, and more. It offers flexibility for building and distributing applications across various platforms. CodeMagic, on the other hand, primarily focuses on Flutter app development and provides a specialized solution specifically for Flutter-based projects.

  3. Pricing Model: Bitrise follows a tiered pricing model based on usage and includes a free plan with limited features. It offers different pricing tiers with varying levels of features and capabilities. CodeMagic, on the other hand, offers a more straightforward pricing structure with a single paid plan that includes all features, without any free plan option.

  4. Integration Ecosystem: Bitrise provides a comprehensive integration ecosystem, allowing developers to easily connect their CI/CD workflows with various tools and services, such as GitHub, Slack, Jira, Firebase, and more. CodeMagic, while not as extensive as Bitrise, still offers integration options for popular services, including GitHub and Slack.

  5. Community and Support: Bitrise has a large and active community, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for developers. It also has an active forum for community discussions and problem-solving. CodeMagic, being a relatively newer platform, has a smaller community but still provides access to documentation, guides, and limited community support.

  6. Deployment Options: Bitrise offers a wide range of deployment options, including app store distribution for both iOS and Android, as well as various other distribution methods like email, Slack, and more. CodeMagic primarily focuses on app store deployment for iOS and Android applications.

In summary, Bitrise provides extensive customization options, supports a wide range of platforms, and has a diverse integration ecosystem, while CodeMagic focuses on simplicity for Flutter app development, offers a simplified pricing structure, and primarily focuses on app store deployment.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Bitrise
Pros of Codemagic
  • 18
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Bitbucket Integration
  • 8
    Advanced Workflow configuration
  • 7
    Slack integration
  • 7
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Great tools for iOS and Android development
  • 5
    Friendly & Easy to use
  • 4
    Great support
  • 3
    Pricing by concurrency, not team size
  • 2
    Fast Updates
  • 2
    Discounts for contributors
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 1
    Fast Builds
  • 1
    Developer centric
  • 2
    Apple Developer Portal integration
  • 2
    Flutter support
  • 1
    Fast and great support
  • 1
    500 free build minutes/month
  • 1
    Fast builds
  • 1
    Bitbucket integration
  • 1
    GitLab integration
  • 1
    Github integration
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Automatic iOS code signing
  • 1
    Newest Xcode version
  • 1
    Always up to date with the latest developer tools
  • 1
    Customisable workflows
  • 1
    CI/CD for Unity
  • 1
    Great for teams

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Bitrise?

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

What is Codemagic?

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Bitrise?
What companies use Codemagic?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Bitrise?
What tools integrate with Codemagic?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Bitrise and Codemagic?
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
CircleCI
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
Buddybuild
Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.
fastlane
fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.
Nevercode
It is a cloud-based continuous integration & delivery platform for iOS, Android, Cordova, Ionic and React Native. It helps you to release defect-free mobile apps and to save countless hours of manual work every week.
See all alternatives