Blade vs Handlebars.js

Overview

Handlebars.js

Stacks8.3K

Followers3.2K

Votes308

Blade

Stacks50

Followers83

Votes0

Blade vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: Blade and Handlebars.js are both popular template engines used in web development. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between these two technologies.

Template Syntax: Blade uses a concise and expressive syntax that closely resembles regular PHP code, making it easy for developers familiar with PHP to work with Blade templates. On the other hand, Handlebars.js uses a more flexible and data-driven syntax that allows for dynamic content rendering using variables and helpers.
Conditionals and Loops: Blade provides powerful directives like @if, @foreach, and @while that allow developers to easily handle conditionals and loops within templates. Handlebars.js also offers similar functionality with conditions using {{#if}} and iterating over arrays using {{#each}}, but it lacks the ability to directly use looping constructs like for or while.
Built-in Helpers: Blade comes with a set of handy helpers that simplify common tasks, such as URL generation, form creation, and authentication. These helpers can be easily included in Blade templates using directives like @url, @form, and @auth. In contrast, Handlebars.js does not provide built-in helpers out of the box, but developers can create their own custom helpers to extend its functionality.
Partials/Includes: Blade offers a convenient way to include reusable code snippets called partials, using the @include directive. This makes it easy to modularize templates and reuse components across different views. Handlebars.js also supports template inclusion using the {{> partial}} syntax, allowing for code reuse, but it lacks the ability to pass data to included templates.
Template Inheritance: Blade provides template inheritance, allowing developers to create a base layout template with common markup and placeholders for dynamic content. Child templates can then extend and override specific sections of the base template using the @extends and @section directives. Handlebars.js does not natively support template inheritance, requiring developers to use alternative methods or third-party libraries to achieve similar functionality.
Server-side vs Client-side Rendering: Blade is primarily designed for server-side rendering, where the template engine generates the HTML on the server and sends it to the client. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a client-side template engine that allows for dynamic rendering of templates directly in the browser. This difference in rendering approaches can influence factors such as initial page load time, caching strategies, and SEO considerations.

In summary, Blade and Handlebars.js have noteworthy differences in their template syntax, conditionals and loops handling, built-in helpers, partials/includes functionality, template inheritance support, and rendering approach. These distinctions make each technology suitable for different use cases and development requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, Blade

Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET

Handlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js	Blade
Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.	It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.
-	Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up
Statistics
Stacks 8.3K	Stacks 50
Followers 3.2K	Followers 83
Votes 308	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 106 Simple 76 Great templating language 50 Open source 36 Logicless 20 Integrates well into any codebase	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Mustache	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, Blade?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Blade vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Template Syntax: Blade uses a concise and expressive syntax that closely resembles regular PHP code, making it easy for developers familiar with PHP to work with Blade templates. On the other hand, Handlebars.js uses a more flexible and data-driven syntax that allows for dynamic content rendering using variables and helpers.
Conditionals and Loops: Blade provides powerful directives like @if, @foreach, and @while that allow developers to easily handle conditionals and loops within templates. Handlebars.js also offers similar functionality with conditions using {{#if}} and iterating over arrays using {{#each}}, but it lacks the ability to directly use looping constructs like for or while.
Built-in Helpers: Blade comes with a set of handy helpers that simplify common tasks, such as URL generation, form creation, and authentication. These helpers can be easily included in Blade templates using directives like @url, @form, and @auth. In contrast, Handlebars.js does not provide built-in helpers out of the box, but developers can create their own custom helpers to extend its functionality.
Partials/Includes: Blade offers a convenient way to include reusable code snippets called partials, using the @include directive. This makes it easy to modularize templates and reuse components across different views. Handlebars.js also supports template inclusion using the {{> partial}} syntax, allowing for code reuse, but it lacks the ability to pass data to included templates.
Template Inheritance: Blade provides template inheritance, allowing developers to create a base layout template with common markup and placeholders for dynamic content. Child templates can then extend and override specific sections of the base template using the @extends and @section directives. Handlebars.js does not natively support template inheritance, requiring developers to use alternative methods or third-party libraries to achieve similar functionality.
Server-side vs Client-side Rendering: Blade is primarily designed for server-side rendering, where the template engine generates the HTML on the server and sends it to the client. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a client-side template engine that allows for dynamic rendering of templates directly in the browser. This difference in rendering approaches can influence factors such as initial page load time, caching strategies, and SEO considerations.

Blade vs Handlebars.js

Overview