BlazeMeter vs Loader.io

Overview

Loader.io

Stacks71

Followers173

Votes18

BlazeMeter

Stacks68

Followers158

Votes13

BlazeMeter vs Loader.io: What are the differences?

Introduction: BlazeMeter and Loader.io are both popular performance testing tools used by developers and testers to analyze the behavior of their applications under load conditions. However, there are key differences between the two that can impact the choice of tool for a specific use case.

Free Tier Limitations: BlazeMeter offers a free tier with limited features and a cap on the number of virtual users that can be simulated, whereas Loader.io provides a more generous free tier with higher limits on the number of concurrent users that can be tested.
Integration Capabilities: BlazeMeter is known for its seamless integration with popular tools like Jenkins, Git, and JIRA, making it convenient for teams already using these tools. In contrast, Loader.io has fewer integrations and may require additional effort for full integration with existing workflows.
Customization Options: Loader.io provides more flexibility in terms of customizing test scripts and scenarios, allowing users to fine-tune their tests according to specific requirements. BlazeMeter, while offering customization options, may not be as robust in terms of tailoring tests to unique use cases.
Reporting and Analysis: BlazeMeter offers advanced reporting and analysis features, including detailed graphs, charts, and metrics that provide deep insights into performance metrics. Loader.io, on the other hand, may have more limited reporting capabilities, making it less suitable for in-depth performance analysis.
Support and Documentation: BlazeMeter is backed by comprehensive documentation and a strong support team, ensuring that users have access to resources and assistance when needed. Loader.io may have fewer support resources available, which could be a consideration for teams requiring more hands-on guidance.
Scalability and Performance: BlazeMeter is designed for high scalability, allowing users to simulate a large number of virtual users and analyze application performance under heavy load. Loader.io, while also scalable, may have limitations in terms of simulating extremely high loads, making it less suitable for enterprise-level testing.

In Summary, BlazeMeter and Loader.io differ in terms of free tier offerings, integration capabilities, customization options, reporting features, support, and scalability, with each tool catering to different needs in performance testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Loader.io, BlazeMeter

Join

Jul 12, 2022

Needs adviceon

MQTT

Kafka

Azure Pipelines

Kindly suggest the best tool for generating 10Mn+ concurrent user load. The tool must support MQTT traffic, REST API, support to interfaces such as Kafka, websockets, persistence HTTP connection, auth type support to assess the support /coverage.

The tool can be integrated into CI pipelines like Azure Pipelines, GitHub, and Jenkins.

319k views319k

Comments

Ratan

QA Manager at Verisys

Feb 12, 2020

Needs advice

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

36.3k views36.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Loader.io	BlazeMeter
Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.	Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>
Share Graphs and Stats- anytime, anywhere;GUI or API- load test how you want	100% JMeter Compatible- Take full advantage of JMeter’s scripting capabilities or let our auto-scripting feature take care of the details.;Scalable and Realistic- Easily scale from 100 to 300,000+ concurrent users using realistic visitor behaviour and browser simulation.;Start Testing in 2 Minutes- Use up to 100 dedicated servers per test. No setup or installation required. Self-service and on-demand.;Intuitive Reporting- See test results in real time or easily compare multiple tests. All with a simple to use interface and intuitive graphs.;Pay only for what you need- Flexible pricing that accommodates hourly, monthly or annual usage. No setup or maintenance fees.<br>
Statistics
Stacks 71	Stacks 68
Followers 173	Followers 158
Votes 18	Votes 13
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Easy to use 6 Free tier 3 Heroku add-on	Pros 10 I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts. 3 Easy to prepare JMeter workers Cons 1 Costly 1 UI centric
Integrations
cloudControl	TeamCity Jenkins Bamboo CloudBees Heroku New Relic AppDynamics Amazon CloudWatch Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Loader.io, BlazeMeter?

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

LoadNinja

It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.

Artillery

It is a modern, open-source, powerful & easy-to-use performance testing toolkit. Use it to ship scalable applications that stay performant & resilient under high load. It prioritizes developer productivity and happiness and follows the “batteries-included” philosophy.

Related Comparisons

BlazeMeter vs Loader.io: What are the differences?

Free Tier Limitations: BlazeMeter offers a free tier with limited features and a cap on the number of virtual users that can be simulated, whereas Loader.io provides a more generous free tier with higher limits on the number of concurrent users that can be tested.
Integration Capabilities: BlazeMeter is known for its seamless integration with popular tools like Jenkins, Git, and JIRA, making it convenient for teams already using these tools. In contrast, Loader.io has fewer integrations and may require additional effort for full integration with existing workflows.
Customization Options: Loader.io provides more flexibility in terms of customizing test scripts and scenarios, allowing users to fine-tune their tests according to specific requirements. BlazeMeter, while offering customization options, may not be as robust in terms of tailoring tests to unique use cases.
Reporting and Analysis: BlazeMeter offers advanced reporting and analysis features, including detailed graphs, charts, and metrics that provide deep insights into performance metrics. Loader.io, on the other hand, may have more limited reporting capabilities, making it less suitable for in-depth performance analysis.
Support and Documentation: BlazeMeter is backed by comprehensive documentation and a strong support team, ensuring that users have access to resources and assistance when needed. Loader.io may have fewer support resources available, which could be a consideration for teams requiring more hands-on guidance.
Scalability and Performance: BlazeMeter is designed for high scalability, allowing users to simulate a large number of virtual users and analyze application performance under heavy load. Loader.io, while also scalable, may have limitations in terms of simulating extremely high loads, making it less suitable for enterprise-level testing.

BlazeMeter vs Loader.io

Overview