Blue Ocean vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?
Blue Ocean: A reboot of the Jenkins CI/CD User Experience. Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team; SVN (Subversion): Enterprise-class centralized version control for the masses. Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
Blue Ocean belongs to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack, while SVN (Subversion) can be primarily classified under "Version Control System".
"Beautiful interface" is the primary reason why developers consider Blue Ocean over the competitors, whereas "Easy to use" was stated as the key factor in picking SVN (Subversion).
Blue Ocean and SVN (Subversion) are both open source tools. Blue Ocean with 2.49K GitHub stars and 435 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than SVN (Subversion) with 327 GitHub stars and 120 GitHub forks.
LinkedIn, Coderus, and Deveo are some of the popular companies that use SVN (Subversion), whereas Blue Ocean is used by CityLiv, Nexus National Security Network, and iCodeBetter. SVN (Subversion) has a broader approval, being mentioned in 77 company stacks & 59 developers stacks; compared to Blue Ocean, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 10 developer stacks.
What is Blue Ocean?
What is SVN (Subversion)?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Blue Ocean?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
I use Git instead of SVN (Subversion) because it allows us to scale our development team. At any given time, the Zulip open source project has hundreds of open pull requests from tens of contributors, each in various stages of the pipeline. Git's workflow makes it very easy to context switch between different feature branches.
I use Visual Studio Code because at this time is a mature software and I can do practically everything using it.
It's free and open source: The project is hosted on GitHub and it’s free to download, fork, modify and contribute to the project.
Multi-platform: You can download binaries for different platforms, included Windows (x64), MacOS and Linux (
LightWeight: It runs smoothly in different devices. It has an average memory and CPU usage. Starts almost immediately and it’s very stable.
.properties, XML and JSON files.
Integrated tools: Includes an integrated terminal, debugger, problem list and console output inspector. The project navigator sidebar is simple and powerful: you can manage your files and folders with ease. The command palette helps you find commands by text. The search widget has a powerful auto-complete feature to search and find your files.
Extensible and configurable: There are many extensions available for every language supported, including syntax highlighters, IntelliSense and code completion, and debuggers. There are also extension to manage application configuration and architecture like Docker and Jenkins.
Integrated with Git: You can visually manage your project repositories, pull, commit and push your changes, and easy conflict resolution.( there is support for SVN (Subversion) users by plugin)
My current work has taught me so much of SVN. Though it is classic and has own pros and cons, I like it too specially the way it handles and tracks the edits with revision numbers and merge techniques.