StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. Blue Ocean vs SVN (Subversion)

Blue Ocean vs SVN (Subversion)

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Stacks791
Followers629
Votes43
GitHub Stars614
Forks188
Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean
Stacks92
Followers167
Votes7
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks537

Blue Ocean vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

## Blue Ocean vs SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion) is a centralized version control system, where all team members work on the same codebase. Blue Ocean, on the other hand, is a Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) tool designed for modern software development.

1. **Graphical User Interface**: Blue Ocean provides a modern, intuitive, and visually appealing interface, making it easier for users to navigate and understand the status of their pipelines and projects. SVN, on the other hand, utilizes a command-line interface for version control operations, which may be less user-friendly for some users.
   
2. **Pipeline Visualization**: Blue Ocean offers a graphical representation of pipelines, displaying the entire delivery pipeline, making it easier to visualize and understand the stages involved. In contrast, SVN focuses on versioning files and directories, lacking the visualization capabilities provided by Blue Ocean.

3. **Integration with Jenkins**: Blue Ocean is built on top of Jenkins, enhancing its capabilities for CI/CD processes. SVN, on the other hand, although it can be used in conjunction with Jenkins, does not offer the same level of integration and automation for the development workflow.

4. **Branching and Merging**: Blue Ocean supports branching and merging as part of its CI/CD processes, allowing for parallel development and efficient code management. While SVN also supports branching and merging, its approach is more traditional and may not be as seamless or efficient as Blue Ocean's methods.

5. **Cloud Integration**: Blue Ocean provides seamless integration with cloud services, allowing users to deploy their applications to various cloud platforms directly from the CI/CD pipeline. SVN, being primarily a version control system, does not offer the same level of cloud integration and deployment capabilities as Blue Ocean.

6. **Community Support**: Blue Ocean benefits from the larger Jenkins community, providing access to a wealth of resources, plugins, and support from a diverse user base. SVN, while it has its own user community, may not have the same level of active development and community support as Blue Ocean.

In Summary, Blue Ocean offers a modern, user-friendly interface with advanced CI/CD capabilities and deep integration with Jenkins, whereas SVN is a traditional centralized version control system focused on file versioning and lacks the visual representation and automation features provided by Blue Ocean.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team.

-
Sophisticated visualizations of CD pipelines, allowing for fast and intuitive comprehension of software pipeline status.;Pipeline editor (In Development) that makes automating CD pipelines approachable by guiding the user through an intuitive and visual process to create a pipeline.;Personalization of the Jenkins UI to suit the role-based needs of each member of the DevOps team.;Pinpoint precision when intervention is needed and/or issues arise. The Blue Ocean UI shows where in the pipeline attention is needed, facilitating exception handling and increasing productivity.;Native integration for branch and pull requests enables maximum developer productivity when collaborating on code with others in GitHub and Bitbucket.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
614
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Forks
188
GitHub Forks
537
Stacks
791
Stacks
92
Followers
629
Followers
167
Votes
43
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Simple code versioning
  • 5
    User/Access Management
  • 3
    Complicated code versionioning by Subversion
  • 2
    Free
Cons
  • 7
    Branching and tagging use tons of disk space
Pros
  • 7
    Beautiful interface
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to SVN (Subversion), Blue Ocean?

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana