StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. RancherOS vs boot2docker

RancherOS vs boot2docker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

boot2docker
boot2docker
Stacks263
Followers211
Votes95
GitHub Stars8.3K
Forks1.3K
RancherOS
RancherOS
Stacks104
Followers158
Votes3
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks654

RancherOS vs boot2docker: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing RancherOS and boot2docker, there are key differences that set them apart. Both are lightweight Linux distributions designed for running containerized applications, but they have distinct features that cater to different use cases.

1. Underlying System Architecture: RancherOS is designed to run Docker containers directly on an stripped-down Linux distribution that only includes the necessary components to host containers. In contrast, boot2docker is built on a tiny Linux distribution that runs Docker inside a virtual machine using VirtualBox. This fundamental difference in architecture affects how containers are managed and the performance of the overall system.

2. Management Interface: RancherOS comes with a minimalistic user interface for managing containers, system services, and networking configurations. On the other hand, boot2docker relies on the Docker Machine command-line tool for managing Docker environments. This means that RancherOS provides a more streamlined and integrated management experience out of the box.

3. Updates and Maintenance: RancherOS follows a continuous delivery model where updates are seamlessly applied to the system without disrupting running containers. In contrast, boot2docker requires manual updates and maintenance, which can be time-consuming and less efficient in a production environment. This difference in update mechanisms can impact system stability and security.

4. System Resource Requirements: Due to its minimalistic design, RancherOS has lower system resource requirements compared to boot2docker. This makes RancherOS more suitable for resource-constrained environments or for deployments where maximizing container density is a priority. On the other hand, boot2docker may require more resources to run efficiently, especially when multiple containers are involved.

5. Customization and Extensibility: RancherOS allows users to customize and extend the system by adding additional Docker containers that provide system services or tools. This approach enables users to tailor the system to their specific needs and workflows. In contrast, boot2docker has limited customization options, as it is primarily focused on providing a minimal Docker runtime environment without extensive extensibility features.

6. Community and Support: RancherOS has a dedicated community and support ecosystem that provides resources, documentation, and community-driven solutions. This can be beneficial for users seeking help or guidance when using RancherOS in production environments. On the other hand, boot2docker, while supported by Docker, may have a smaller community presence and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and support.

In Summary, RancherOS and boot2docker differ in system architecture, management interface, update mechanisms, resource requirements, customization options, and community support, catering to different use cases and preferences in containerized environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

boot2docker
boot2docker
RancherOS
RancherOS

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

It makes it simple to run containers at scale in development, test and production. By containerizing system services and leveraging Docker for management, the operating system provides a very reliable and easy to manage containers.

Kernel 3.14.1 with AUFS, Docker 0.10.1, LXC 0.8.0;Container persistence via disk automount on /var/lib/docker;SSH keys persistence via disk automount
Lightweight; Rancher Integration; Kuberenetes Integration;Minimalist OS;Comprehensive System Services;Improved Security
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.3K
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Forks
1.3K
GitHub Forks
654
Stacks
263
Stacks
104
Followers
211
Followers
158
Votes
95
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 43
    Lightweight
  • 35
    Use docker when it's not natively possible
  • 11
    Use it for fast demo without big image
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Containers
Pros
  • 3
    System-docker
Integrations
Docker
Docker
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Docker
Docker
Rancher
Rancher
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to boot2docker, RancherOS?

Vagrant

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot