StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Buffalo vs Revel

Buffalo vs Revel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Revel
Revel
Stacks36
Followers100
Votes38
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.4K
Buffalo
Buffalo
Stacks13
Followers50
Votes5
GitHub Stars8.3K
Forks585

Buffalo vs Revel: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Buffalo and Revel

Buffalo and Revel are two popular web development frameworks based on the Go language, each offering unique features and functionalities tailored to different development needs. Below are the key differences between Buffalo and Revel:

1. **Architecture:** Buffalo follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, making it ideal for larger, more complex web applications. In contrast, Revel utilizes the more opinionated convention over configuration approach, providing a simpler structure for rapid development of smaller projects.

2. **ORM Support:** Buffalo has built-in support for the Pop (PostgreSQL ORM for Golang), making database integration seamless and efficient. On the other hand, Revel does not have native ORM support, requiring developers to use external libraries or tools for database management.

3. **Hot Code Reloading:** Revel offers automatic code reloading, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without manually restarting the server. Buffalo, while supporting live reloading through tools like air or buffalo dev, does not provide the same level of seamless integration as Revel.

4. **Routing Approach:** Buffalo employs a flexible routing system that allows for dynamic route definitions based on HTTP methods and URL patterns. In contrast, Revel utilizes a more traditional static routing approach, which may be preferable for projects where explicit routing configuration is desired.

5. **Dependency Injection:** Buffalo emphasizes dependency injection as a core principle, promoting modularity and testability within the codebase. Revel, on the other hand, does not prioritize dependency injection, potentially leading to less flexible and testable code in certain scenarios.

6. **Community and Ecosystem:** Buffalo boasts a vibrant community and rich ecosystem of plugins and extensions, providing ample resources for developers to enhance their applications. Revel, while still well-supported, may have a smaller community and fewer available resources for extended functionality.

In Summary, Buffalo and Revel offer distinct approaches to web development in Go, catering to different project requirements and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Revel
Revel
Buffalo
Buffalo

Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle.

Buffalo is Go web framework. Yeah, I hate the word "framework" too! Buffalo is different though. Buffalo doesn't want to re-invent wheels like routing and templating. Buffalo is glue that wraps all of the best packages available and makes them all play nicely together.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
8.3K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
585
Stacks
36
Stacks
13
Followers
100
Followers
50
Votes
38
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    MVC
  • 4
    High performance
Pros
  • 4
    Go
  • 1
    Friendly Api
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Revel, Buffalo?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase