Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bugsnag vs Crashlytics: What are the differences?
Introduction Bugsnag and Crashlytics are both crash reporting tools used by developers to track and debug errors in their applications. While both have similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.
Data Collection and Reporting: Bugsnag collects and reports both crash and error events, providing detailed information such as stack traces, breadcrumbs, and user data. It also supports custom error monitoring. On the other hand, Crashlytics primarily focuses on crash reporting and provides limited customization options for error monitoring. It offers crash analytics with detailed crash logs, but lacks advanced features like breadcrumbs or custom error monitoring.
Integration and Platform Support: Bugsnag offers seamless integrations with a wide range of platforms, including mobile (iOS, Android), web (JavaScript, Ruby, Python), and server-side technologies (Java, Node.js). It provides SDKs and libraries for easy integration with different platforms. Crashlytics, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with Firebase and primarily supports mobile platforms, especially iOS and Android. It does not provide extensive support for web or server-side technologies.
Monitoring and Alerting: Bugsnag provides real-time error monitoring and alerting capabilities. It offers customizable thresholds and notifications, allowing developers to proactively monitor errors and respond quickly. Crashlytics also provides real-time crash monitoring, but lacks advanced alerting features. It sends crash reports to developers via email, but does not offer customizable thresholds or notifications.
User Feedback and Communication: Bugsnag allows developers to collect user feedback directly from within the application, enabling more effective communication between developers and users. It provides in-app feedback forms and user survey features. Crashlytics does not offer built-in user feedback features, focusing solely on crash reporting and analytics.
Team Collaboration and Workflow: Bugsnag offers advanced collaboration features, allowing multiple team members to collaborate on error tracking and debugging. It provides features like error assignment, commenting, and workflow management, making it easier to track and resolve issues as a team. Crashlytics, on the other hand, lacks these collaboration features and primarily caters to individual developers or small teams.
Cost and Pricing Model: Bugsnag offers flexible pricing plans, including free options for small-scale applications, while also providing enterprise-level plans for larger organizations. Its pricing is based on the number of error events and additional features. Crashlytics, on the other hand, is a part of Firebase and is available for free as part of the Firebase Crashlytics service. It does not have separate pricing plans or additional features for customization.
In summary, Bugsnag offers more comprehensive error monitoring and reporting capabilities, with extensive platform support, advanced customization options, and team collaboration features. Crashlytics, on the other hand, focuses primarily on crash reporting for mobile platforms, with limited customization options and collaboration features.
I am also considering Logstash.
I want to add a remote debugging tool for my application, and my application is currently live in 10 countries. So, the scale is quite big. Can you help me choose the best client-side debugging tool? Also, are there any tools available in the market that provide 3rd party server integration too?
Bugfender is mainly focused on getting the application logs, which is very useful for debugging and reproducing errors reported by users. Also has a "user feedback" option, that lets you get feedback from your users and get the application logs alongside it. Bugsnag and Crashlytics are more focused on "error analytics", mostly crashes, and they're more advanced in terms of analytics and detection of trends in crashes. I hope I helped! Disclaimer: I'm one of the founders of Bugfender.
Bugsnag is one of my favorite tools. I must admit that I can't compare with the other two variants, because I only have experience with Sentry and Bugsnag. Both are fine, but I lean towards Bugsnag. With the help of Bugsnag I'm able to see quite clearly what went wrong, and it shows the affected users (and in my case even the tenant as we're operating a multi-tenant application).
Regarding Logstash: I've been using Bugsnag as a complementary tool with Logging + APM platforms like NewRelic or Datadog. What I mean is, go for Logstash if that's the log monitoring tool you like, but Bugsnag and Logstash are not interchangeable, and it perfectly makes sense to use both.
Pros of Bugsnag
- Lots of 3rd party integrations45
- Really reliable42
- Includes a free plan37
- No usage or rate limits25
- Design23
- Slack integration21
- Responsive support21
- Free tier19
- Unlimited11
- No Rate6
- Email notifications5
- Great customer support3
- React Native3
- Integrates well with Laravel3
- Reliable, great UI and insights, used for all our apps3
Pros of Crashlytics
- Crash tracking78
- Mobile exception tracking56
- Free53
- Easy deployment37
- Ios25
- Great ui15
- Great reports11
- Android10
- Advanced Logging8
- Monitor Tester Lifecycle7
- Mac APP and IDE Plugins3
- Great User Experience3
- In Real-Time3
- iOS SDK3
- Security3
- Android SDK3
- The UI is simple and it just works2
- Best UI2
- Light2
- Real-time2
- Seamless2
- Painless App Distribution2
- Crash Reporting2
- Beta distribution2
- Mobile Analytics2
- Deep Workflow Integration2
- IOS QA Deploy and tracking1
- Easy iOS Integration1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bugsnag
- Error grouping doesn't always work2
- Bad billing model2