Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
C# vs Electron: What are the differences?
Developers describe C# as "Simple, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language for the .NET platform". C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers. On the other hand, Electron is detailed as "Build cross platform desktop apps with web technologies. Formerly known as Atom Shell, made by GitHub". With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.
C# can be classified as a tool in the "Languages" category, while Electron is grouped under "Cross-Platform Desktop Development".
"Cool syntax" is the top reason why over 280 developers like C#, while over 50 developers mention "Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications" as the leading cause for choosing Electron.
Electron is an open source tool with 74.4K GitHub stars and 9.72K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Electron's open source repository on GitHub.
Stack Exchange, PedidosYa, and Coderus are some of the popular companies that use C#, whereas Electron is used by Slack, WebbyLab, and triGo GmbH. C# has a broader approval, being mentioned in 684 company stacks & 1119 developers stacks; compared to Electron, which is listed in 213 company stacks and 366 developer stacks.
In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.
To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.
Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.
For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.
That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.
We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.
As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.
C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.
Pros of C#
- Cool syntax347
- Great lambda support289
- Great generics support261
- Language integrated query (linq)207
- Extension methods178
- Automatic garbage collection91
- Properties with get/set methods88
- Backed by microsoft81
- Automatic memory management69
- Amaizing Crossplatform Support60
- High performance43
- LINQ39
- Beautiful35
- Great ecosystem of community packages with Nuget33
- Vibrant developer community25
- Great readability22
- Dead-simple asynchronous programming with async/await20
- Visual Studio - Great IDE16
- Open source15
- Productive14
- Strongly typed by default, dynamic typing when needed14
- Object oriented programming paradigm13
- Easy separation of config/application code11
- Great community9
- Operator overloading8
- OOPS simplified with great syntax7
- Cool7
- Events management using delegates7
- Linq expressions6
- Good language to teach OO concepts6
- High-performance6
- Unity6
- Conditional compilation6
- Organized and clean5
- Coherent language backed by an extensive CLR5
- Comprehensive platform libraries5
- Top level code4
- Concise syntax, productivity designed4
- Lovely2
- Statically typed2
- Interfaces1
- Sophisticated overall1
- Far more sleek and sphisticated than other languages1
- Interfaces0
Pros of Electron
- Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications67
- Open source51
- Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code13
- Because it's cross platform7
- Use Node.js in the Main Process3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of C#
- Poor x-platform GUI support15
- Closed source8
- Fast and secure7
- Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma7
Cons of Electron
- Uses a lot of memory18
- User experience never as good as a native app8
- No proper documentation4
- Does not native4
- Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs1
- Wrong reference for dom inspection1