StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs CakePHP

.NET vs CakePHP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.3K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
CakePHP
CakePHP
Stacks672
Followers401
Votes137
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks3.4K

.NET vs CakePHP: What are the differences?

Key Differences between .NET and CakePHP

Introduction

This Markdown provides a comparison of the key differences between the .NET framework and the CakePHP framework. .NET is a software framework developed by Microsoft that primarily runs on Microsoft Windows. On the other hand, CakePHP is an open-source web application framework written in PHP.

  1. Language Compatibility: The main difference between .NET and CakePHP is the programming language they use. .NET primarily uses C# (C Sharp), while CakePHP is based on PHP. C# is a statically-typed language developed by Microsoft, known for its strong type checking and extensive libraries. PHP, on the other hand, is a dynamically-typed scripting language specifically designed for web development.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Another major difference lies in their platform compatibility. .NET is predominantly designed for Windows operating systems, whereas CakePHP is cross-platform and can be used on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes CakePHP a more versatile choice for developers who need to work with different platforms.

  3. Development Philosophy: The frameworks also differ in their development philosophy. .NET follows a more formal and structured approach, relying on object-oriented programming principles and frameworks. In contrast, CakePHP promotes rapid application development (RAD) using existing conventions and pre-built functionalities. This allows developers to build applications quickly without spending too much time on boilerplate code.

  4. Community and Support: The communities surrounding .NET and CakePHP also differ in terms of size and support. Being supported by Microsoft, .NET has a large and well-established community. This translates to extensive documentation, abundant online resources, and a vast array of third-party libraries. CakePHP, while not as extensive as .NET's community, does have a dedicated user base and a supportive community that provides resources and assistance.

  5. Ecosystem and Integration: The ecosystem of .NET and CakePHP also varies. With .NET, developers have access to a rich ecosystem of software development tools, such as Visual Studio, NuGet package manager, and Azure cloud services. This enables seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies. CakePHP, while not as extensive, offers a range of plugins, extensions, and packages that can be easily integrated into the framework, allowing developers to extend the functionality of their applications.

  6. Learning Curve: Finally, the learning curve for the two frameworks also differs. .NET, with its more formal and structured approach, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners. It requires a good understanding of object-oriented programming concepts and can be more complex to grasp initially. CakePHP, on the other hand, follows conventions and is relatively easier to learn, especially for developers with prior experience in PHP.

In summary, the key differences between .NET and CakePHP lie in the programming language compatibility, platform compatibility, development philosophy, community and support, ecosystem and integration, and the learning curve. These differences make each framework suitable for different use cases and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, CakePHP

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

Nov 28, 2020

Decided

I was considering focusing on learning RoR and looking for a work that uses those techs.

After some investigation, I decided to stay with C# .NET:

  • It is more requested on job positions (7 to 1 in my personal searches average).

  • It's been around for longer.

  • it has better documentation and community.

  • One of Ruby advantages (its amazing community gems, that allows to quickly build parts of your systems by merely putting together third party components) gets quite complicated to use and maintain in huge applications, where building and reusing your own components may become a better approach.

  • Rail's front end support is starting to waver.

  • C# .NET code is far easier to understand, debug and maintain. Although certainly not easier to learn from scratch.

  • Though Rails has an excellent programming speed, C# tends to get the upper hand in long term projects.

I would avise to stick to rails when building small projects, and switching to C# for more long term ones.

Opinions are welcome!

399k views399k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments
Noe
Noe

Software Engineer

Aug 13, 2021

Decided

Node Js have worked incredible great for me on every project I had. It is fast enough to support big and small apps, you do not have to worry about performance, because it is very capable of building a big REST API.

One advantage is that the learning curve is lower when you have used javascript on web browser as frontend, so, it is easy to migrate from Frontend to Backend with node.

Node Package Manager (NPM) has an incredible amount of packages from many developers, so you can use them on your project as you need them.

Code is easy to support, way different than Java Legacy code.

114k views114k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
CakePHP
CakePHP

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
672
Followers
5.9K
Followers
401
Votes
1.9K
Votes
137
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 35
    Open source
  • 25
    Really rapid framework
  • 19
    Good code organization
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 10
    Security best practices
Cons
  • 1
    Follows Good Programming Practices
  • 1
    Robust Baking Tool
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to .NET, CakePHP?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase