Capybara vs react-testing-library

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Capybara

624
191
+ 1
15
react-testing-library

271
155
+ 1
4
Add tool

Capybara vs react-testing-library: What are the differences?

Developers describe Capybara as "Acceptance test framework for web applications". Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem. On the other hand, react-testing-library is detailed as "A lightweight solution for testing React components". It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

Capybara and react-testing-library belong to "Testing Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Capybara are:

  • No setup necessary for Rails and Rack application. Works out of the box.
  • Intuitive API which mimics the language an actual user would use.
  • Switch the backend your tests run against from fast headless mode to an actual browser with no changes to your tests.

On the other hand, react-testing-library provides the following key features:

  • light-weight solution for testing
  • React DOM testing utilities
  • works with any environment that provides DOM APIs

Capybara and react-testing-library are both open source tools. Capybara with 8.87K GitHub stars and 1.3K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than react-testing-library with 8.25K GitHub stars and 464 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Capybara has a broader approval, being mentioned in 52 company stacks & 95 developers stacks; compared to react-testing-library, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Capybara
Pros of react-testing-library
  • 12
    Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps
  • 2
    Synchronous with Rack::Test
  • 1
    Fast with Rack::Test
  • 3
    We can test behavior
  • 1
    Good documentation

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Capybara
Cons of react-testing-library
  • 1
    Hard to make reproducible tests when using with browser
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Capybara?

    Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

    What is react-testing-library?

    It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Capybara?
    What companies use react-testing-library?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Capybara?
    What tools integrate with react-testing-library?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Capybara and react-testing-library?
    Wombat
    Automate your store in no time: Wombat is an ecommerce integration platform that quickly connects your storefront with all your favorite 3rd party services. Comprehensive enough for large ecommerce stores and easy enough for small merchants
    Cucumber
    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.
    Anaconda
    A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    Quokka
    You send great emails but sometimes it gets lost in a user’s inbox. Quokka shows a retargeting message to those who ignored your message so that they will never miss an important update from you.
    See all alternatives