StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. Caret vs scikit-learn

Caret vs scikit-learn

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

scikit-learn
scikit-learn
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.1K
Votes45
GitHub Stars63.9K
Forks26.4K
Caret
Caret
Stacks24
Followers59
Votes0

Caret vs scikit-learn: What are the differences?

Caret vs scikit-learn: Key Differences

Caret and scikit-learn are both popular machine learning libraries used for building predictive models. While they have similarities in terms of their goal, there are several key differences between the two.

1. Language and Ecosystem: Caret is predominantly used with R, whereas scikit-learn is a Python library. Caret takes advantage of the extensive R ecosystem, including its wide range of statistical packages, while scikit-learn integrates well with other popular Python libraries such as NumPy and Pandas.

2. Feature Selection: Caret offers a variety of feature selection techniques, including wrapper, filter, and embedded methods. It provides a convenient interface to perform feature selection within the machine learning pipeline. On the other hand, scikit-learn primarily focuses on wrapper methods for feature selection, such as Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and SelectFromModel.

3. Model Tuning: Caret provides an extensive set of functions for automated model tuning, including grid search and random search. It also supports parallel execution for efficient hyperparameter exploration. In contrast, scikit-learn offers simpler grid search and randomized search functionalities but does not provide built-in support for parallel execution.

4. Algorithm Availability: Both Caret and scikit-learn offer a wide range of machine learning algorithms. However, scikit-learn has a more extensive collection of algorithms, including advanced models such as gradient boosting, whereas Caret focuses more on traditional statistical models.

5. Cross-validation: Both libraries support cross-validation for model evaluation. Caret provides a flexible interface to perform various cross-validation strategies, including k-fold cross-validation and repeated cross-validation. Scikit-learn also offers various cross-validation techniques, including stratified k-fold cross-validation and time series cross-validation.

6. Model Pipelines: Scikit-learn provides a powerful tool called pipelines that allows for the construction of complex machine learning workflows, including feature engineering, model fitting, and prediction. Caret does not provide similar built-in functionality for constructing machine learning pipelines.

In summary, Caret and scikit-learn differ in the language and ecosystem they are built upon, the feature selection techniques they offer, the extent of model tuning functionalities, the availability of machine learning algorithms, the flexibility of cross-validation strategies, and the support for constructing machine learning pipelines.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

scikit-learn
scikit-learn
Caret
Caret

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

Better Markdown Editor for Mac / Windows / Linux

-
Code Highlighting; Auto-Completion; Context Commands; Extendable Selection; Preview; File Navigation; Recent Files; Customizable Look
Statistics
GitHub Stars
63.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
26.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
24
Followers
1.1K
Followers
59
Votes
45
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Scientific computing
  • 19
    Easy
Cons
  • 2
    Limited
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to scikit-learn, Caret?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

MacDown

MacDown

MacDown is an open source Markdown editor for OS X, released under the MIT License. It is heavily influenced by Chen Luo’s Mou.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp