StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. CasperJS vs Selenium

CasperJS vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
CasperJS
CasperJS
Stacks76
Followers120
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.2K
Forks972

CasperJS vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CasperJS and Selenium are both popular tools used for web automation testing. While they serve a similar purpose, there are significant differences between the two that can influence the choice of tool for a particular project.

  1. Language Support: CasperJS is primarily based on JavaScript and PhantomJS, while Selenium supports multiple languages such as Java, Python, Ruby, and C#. This difference allows developers to choose their preferred language for writing test scripts, making Selenium more versatile in terms of language support.

  2. Testing Capabilities: Selenium is known for its extensive testing capabilities, offering support for different types of testing such as functional, regression, and performance testing. On the other hand, CasperJS is more focused on high-level testing and user interactions, making it suitable for scenarios where simulating user behaviors is crucial.

  3. Browser Support: Selenium supports a wide range of browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, making it a versatile choice for cross-browser testing. CasperJS, on the other hand, is more limited in terms of browser support and is primarily focused on PhantomJS, which may restrict its applicability in certain testing scenarios.

  4. Community and Documentation: Selenium has a larger and more active community compared to CasperJS, resulting in better support, resources, and documentation available for users. This extensive community support can be advantageous when encountering issues or seeking help during test automation projects.

  5. Execution Speed: CasperJS is known for its faster execution speed compared to Selenium in certain scenarios, particularly due to its lightweight nature and the use of PhantomJS as the headless browser. This difference in execution speed can be a crucial factor when considering the performance of test automation scripts.

  6. Ease of Use: CasperJS is often praised for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a preferred choice for beginners or developers looking for a quick setup. In contrast, Selenium, with its more comprehensive features and capabilities, may have a steeper learning curve for users who are new to test automation.

In Summary, the key differences between CasperJS and Selenium lie in their language support, testing capabilities, browser support, community and documentation, execution speed, and ease of use, all of which can impact the choice of tool for a web automation testing project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, CasperJS

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
CasperJS
CasperJS

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

CasperJS is a browser navigation scripting & testing utility written in Javascript for PhantomJS or SlimerJS.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
7.2K
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
972
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
76
Followers
12.6K
Followers
120
Votes
527
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PhantomJS
PhantomJS

What are some alternatives to Selenium, CasperJS?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana