Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Castle vs OpenSSL: What are the differences?
Developers describe Castle as "Track security events or any unstructured data from your web backend or mobile app, and Castle will look for anomalies". Castle looks for suspicious login patterns without bothering the legitimate user nor the site administrator. The fully-automated anti-hijack engine identifies potential account compromises based on where the user logs in from and how they navigate the site. On the other hand, OpenSSL is detailed as "Full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security and Secure Sockets Layer protocols". It is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It is also a general-purpose cryptography library.
Castle and OpenSSL belong to "Security" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Castle are:
- Security Analytics
- Threat Alerts
- Login Notification Emails
On the other hand, OpenSSL provides the following key features:
- Robust
- Commercial-grade
- Transport Layer Security
Bitbucket, Switchfly, and ThriveHive are some of the popular companies that use OpenSSL, whereas Castle is used by Castle.io, Cityzen Data, and Nuxeo. OpenSSL has a broader approval, being mentioned in 3996 company stacks & 12 developers stacks; compared to Castle, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 16 developer stacks.
