Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Celery
Celery

878
524
+ 1
239
Hutch
Hutch

3
5
+ 1
0
Add tool

Celery vs Hutch: What are the differences?

Celery: Distributed task queue. Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well; Hutch: Inter-Service Communication with RabbitMQ. Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ.

Celery and Hutch can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.

Celery and Hutch are both open source tools. It seems that Celery with 12.9K GitHub stars and 3.33K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Hutch with 712 GitHub stars and 103 GitHub forks.

What is Celery?

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

What is Hutch?

Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Celery?
Why do developers choose Hutch?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Celery?
      What companies use Hutch?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Celery?
      What tools integrate with Hutch?
      What are some alternatives to Celery and Hutch?
      RabbitMQ
      RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      Amazon SQS
      Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
      ActiveMQ
      Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
      ZeroMQ
      The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Celery and Hutch
      James Cunningham
      James Cunningham
      Operations Engineer at Sentry · | 18 upvotes · 85.6K views
      atSentrySentry
      RabbitMQ
      RabbitMQ
      Celery
      Celery
      #MessageQueue

      As Sentry runs throughout the day, there are about 50 different offline tasks that we execute—anything from “process this event, pretty please” to “send all of these cool people some emails.” There are some that we execute once a day and some that execute thousands per second.

      Managing this variety requires a reliably high-throughput message-passing technology. We use Celery's RabbitMQ implementation, and we stumbled upon a great feature called Federation that allows us to partition our task queue across any number of RabbitMQ servers and gives us the confidence that, if any single server gets backlogged, others will pitch in and distribute some of the backlogged tasks to their consumers.

      #MessageQueue

      See more
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Celery and Hutch
      No reviews found
      How developers use Celery and Hutch
      Avatar of Kalibrr
      Kalibrr uses CeleryCelery

      All of our background jobs (e.g., image resizing, file uploading, email and SMS sending) are done through Celery (using Redis as its broker). Celery's scheduling and retrying features are especially useful for error-prone tasks, such as email and SMS sending.

      Avatar of Cloudify
      Cloudify uses CeleryCelery

      For orchestrating the creation of the correct number of instances, managing errors and retries, and finally managing the deallocation of resources we use RabbitMQ in conjunction with the Celery Project framework, along with a self-developed workflow engine.

      Avatar of MOKA Analytics
      MOKA Analytics uses CeleryCelery

      We maintain a fork of Celery 3 that adds HTTPS support for Redis brokers. The Winning Model currently uses Celery 3 because Celery 4 dropped support for Windows.

      We plan on migrating to Celery 4 once Azure ASE supports Linux apps

      Avatar of Yaakov Gesher
      Yaakov Gesher uses CeleryCelery

      We used celery, in combination with RabbitMQ and celery-beat, to run periodic tasks, as well as some user-initiated long-running tasks on the server.

      Avatar of Dieter Adriaenssens
      Dieter Adriaenssens uses CeleryCelery

      Using Celery, the web service creates tasks that are executed by a background worker. Celery uses a RabbitMQ instance as a task queue.

      How much does Celery cost?
      How much does Hutch cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      Pricing unavailable
      News about Hutch
      More news