StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Celery vs Serverless

Celery vs Serverless

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Celery
Celery
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes280
GitHub Stars27.5K
Forks4.9K
Serverless
Serverless
Stacks2.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes28
GitHub Stars46.9K
Forks5.7K

Celery vs Serverless: What are the differences?

Celery vs Serverless

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Celery and Serverless. Both of these technologies are used for task scheduling and execution in distributed environments. However, they have distinct characteristics that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Scalability: Celery is a distributed task queue framework that allows for horizontal scaling by adding more worker nodes. It provides flexibility in terms of scaling up or down based on demand. On the other hand, Serverless computing platforms automatically scale the execution environment up and down based on the incoming request load. This makes Serverless more suitable for applications with unpredictable or bursty workloads.

  2. Execution Environment: Celery requires a separate infrastructure setup with dedicated worker nodes to execute tasks. It relies on a message broker, usually RabbitMQ or Redis, to manage the communication between the task scheduler and workers. In contrast, Serverless platforms provide a managed execution environment where developers can deploy their functions or tasks without the need to manage the underlying infrastructure. This simplifies the deployment process and reduces operational overhead.

  3. Pricing Model: Celery's pricing model is based on the costs associated with infrastructure setup, maintenance, and scaling. Additional costs may arise from managing message brokers and worker nodes. On the other hand, Serverless platforms typically adopt a pay-as-you-go model, where you are billed based on the actual usage of resources during the execution of functions or tasks. This allows for cost optimization, as you only pay for the resources consumed without the need to provision and manage infrastructure.

  4. Programming Language Support: Celery is a Python-based task queue framework, and while it supports other programming languages as well, it is primarily used within the Python ecosystem. Serverless platforms, on the other hand, offer broader support for multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Java, Go, and more. This makes Serverless more suitable for applications built using different programming languages or a polyglot microservices architecture.

  5. Cold Start Performance: Cold start refers to the delay experienced when initiating a function or task execution due to the need to start up the execution environment. In Celery, since the infrastructure and worker nodes are pre-provisioned, there is no cold start delay. In contrast, Serverless platforms may experience a cold start delay, especially when there is no warm execution environment available. This can impact the overall latency and response times for certain types of workloads.

  6. Flexibility and Control: Celery provides a high degree of flexibility and control over the task execution flow and management. You have fine-grained control over the concurrency, routing, and prioritization of tasks. Serverless platforms, while offering simplicity and ease of use, may have limited configuration options, especially when it comes to fine-grained control over the task execution behavior.

Summary

In summary, Celery offers scalability, customizable task execution, and broader programming language support, while Serverless computing platforms provide automatic scaling, managed infrastructure, pay-as-you-go pricing, and simplicity in deployment. Understanding these key differences is essential to choose the right technology for your specific use case.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Celery, Serverless

Tim
Tim

CTO at Checkly Inc.

Sep 18, 2019

Needs adviceonHerokuHerokuAWS LambdaAWS Lambda

When adding a new feature to Checkly rearchitecting some older piece, I tend to pick Heroku for rolling it out. But not always, because sometimes I pick AWS Lambda . The short story:

  • Developer Experience trumps everything.
  • AWS Lambda is cheap. Up to a limit though. This impact not only your wallet.
  • If you need geographic spread, AWS is lonely at the top.

The setup

Recently, I was doing a brainstorm at a startup here in Berlin on the future of their infrastructure. They were ready to move on from their initial, almost 100% Ec2 + Chef based setup. Everything was on the table. But we crossed out a lot quite quickly:

  • Pure, uncut, self hosted Kubernetes — way too much complexity
  • Managed Kubernetes in various flavors — still too much complexity
  • Zeit — Maybe, but no Docker support
  • Elastic Beanstalk — Maybe, bit old but does the job
  • Heroku
  • Lambda

It became clear a mix of PaaS and FaaS was the way to go. What a surprise! That is exactly what I use for Checkly! But when do you pick which model?

I chopped that question up into the following categories:

  • Developer Experience / DX 🤓
  • Ops Experience / OX 🐂 (?)
  • Cost 💵
  • Lock in 🔐

Read the full post linked below for all details

357k views357k
Comments
Shantha
Shantha

Sep 30, 2020

Needs adviceonRabbitMQRabbitMQCeleryCeleryMongoDBMongoDB

I am just a beginner at these two technologies.

Problem statement: I am getting lakh of users from the sequel server for whom I need to create caches in MongoDB by making different REST API requests.

Here these users can be treated as messages. Each REST API request is a task.

I am confused about whether I should go for RabbitMQ alone or Celery.

If I have to go with RabbitMQ, I prefer to use python with Pika module. But the challenge with Pika is, it is not thread-safe. So I am not finding a way to execute a lakh of API requests in parallel using multiple threads using Pika.

If I have to go with Celery, I don't know how I can achieve better scalability in executing these API requests in parallel.

334k views334k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Celery
Celery
Serverless
Serverless

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.5K
GitHub Stars
46.9K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
5.7K
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
2.2K
Followers
1.6K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
280
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Task queue
  • 63
    Python integration
  • 40
    Django integration
  • 30
    Scheduled Task
  • 19
    Publish/subsribe
Cons
  • 4
    Sometimes loses tasks
  • 1
    Depends on broker
Pros
  • 14
    API integration
  • 7
    Supports cloud functions for Google, Azure, and IBM
  • 3
    Lower cost
  • 1
    3. Simplified Management for developers to focus on cod
  • 1
    Openwhisk
Integrations
No integrations available
Azure Functions
Azure Functions
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway

What are some alternatives to Celery, Serverless?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase