Centos vs Debian

Overview

Debian

Stacks16.4K

Followers11.2K

Votes164

CentOS

Stacks13.8K

Followers9.0K

Votes53

Centos vs Debian: What are the differences?

<Markdown code>

Package Management: One key difference between CentOS and Debian lies in their package management systems. CentOS uses YUM (Yellowdog Updater, Modified) as its package manager, while Debian uses APT (Advanced Package Tool). This leads to differences in package availability, repositories, and dependency handling between the two distributions.
Release Cycle: Another notable difference is the release cycle of CentOS and Debian. CentOS is known for its stable and long-term support releases, predominantly based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). On the other hand, Debian has a more frequent release cycle with versions categorized as stable, testing, and unstable.
Init Systems: CentOS traditionally uses SysVinit as its init system, but recent versions have adopted systemd. Debian, on the other hand, has been an early adopter of systemd as its default init system. This choice impacts how services are managed and started on the system.
Community and Support: CentOS is backed by a dedicated organization (formerly by CentOS Project, now part of Red Hat) and has a strong community of users and contributors. Debian, on the other hand, is known for its large and diverse community of developers and users who contribute to its development.
Philosophy and Focus: CentOS is known for its enterprise-focused approach and stability, primarily targeting server environments. Debian, on the other hand, emphasizes free and open-source software principles, with a broader focus on various use cases including desktop, server, and embedded systems.
Default Package Selection: When it comes to default package selection, CentOS is more minimalistic, providing a basic set of tools and packages for a server setup. Debian, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive range of packages by default, catering to various user needs.

In Summary, CentOS and Debian differ in package management, release cycle, init systems, community support, focus areas, and default package selection.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Debian, CentOS

Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Decided

Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.

CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)

271k views271k

Comments

Jaron

CTO at DDVTech B.V.

Aug 27, 2020

Decided

Using Arch Linux for our systems and servers means getting the latest technology and fixes early, as well as early warnings for potential future breakage in other (slower) distributions. It's been easy to maintain, easy to automate, and most importantly: easy to debug.

While our software target is every recent Linux distribution, using Arch internally ensured that everyone understands the full system without any knowledge gaps.

37.1k views37.1k

Comments

Dimelo

Nov 10, 2020

Decided

Coming from a Debian-based Linux background, using the Ubuntu base image for my Docker containers was a natural choice. However, the overhead, even on the impressively-slimmed Hub images, was hard to justify. Seeking to create images that were "just right" in size, without unused packages or dependencies, I made the switch to Alpine.

Alpine's modified BusyBox has a surprising amount of functionality, and the package repository contains plenty of muslc-safe versions of commonly-used packages. It's been a valuable exercise in doing more with less, and, as Alpine is keen to point out, an image with fewer packages makes for a more sustainable environment with a smaller attack surface.

My only regret is that Alpine's documentation leaves a lot to be desired.

66.6k views66.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Debian	CentOS
Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.	The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.
Statistics
Stacks 16.4K	Stacks 13.8K
Followers 11.2K	Followers 9.0K
Votes 164	Votes 53
Pros & Cons
Pros 54 Massively supported 50 Stable 21 Reliable 9 Aptitude 8 It is free Cons 10 Old versions of software 2 Can be difficult to set up on vanilla Debian	Pros 16 Stable 9 Reliable 9 Free to use 6 Has epel packages 6 Good support Cons 1 Yum is a horrible package manager

What are some alternatives to Debian, CentOS?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

FreeBSD

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

Related Comparisons

Centos vs Debian: What are the differences?

<Markdown code>

Package Management: One key difference between CentOS and Debian lies in their package management systems. CentOS uses YUM (Yellowdog Updater, Modified) as its package manager, while Debian uses APT (Advanced Package Tool). This leads to differences in package availability, repositories, and dependency handling between the two distributions.
Release Cycle: Another notable difference is the release cycle of CentOS and Debian. CentOS is known for its stable and long-term support releases, predominantly based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). On the other hand, Debian has a more frequent release cycle with versions categorized as stable, testing, and unstable.
Init Systems: CentOS traditionally uses SysVinit as its init system, but recent versions have adopted systemd. Debian, on the other hand, has been an early adopter of systemd as its default init system. This choice impacts how services are managed and started on the system.
Community and Support: CentOS is backed by a dedicated organization (formerly by CentOS Project, now part of Red Hat) and has a strong community of users and contributors. Debian, on the other hand, is known for its large and diverse community of developers and users who contribute to its development.
Philosophy and Focus: CentOS is known for its enterprise-focused approach and stability, primarily targeting server environments. Debian, on the other hand, emphasizes free and open-source software principles, with a broader focus on various use cases including desktop, server, and embedded systems.
Default Package Selection: When it comes to default package selection, CentOS is more minimalistic, providing a basic set of tools and packages for a server setup. Debian, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive range of packages by default, catering to various user needs.

In Summary, CentOS and Debian differ in package management, release cycle, init systems, community support, focus areas, and default package selection.

Centos vs Debian

Overview