Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Chromeless vs jsdom: What are the differences?


In web development, two popular tools for working with headless browsers are Chromeless and jsdom. These tools have some key differences which can affect their usage and effectiveness in different scenarios.

  1. Interactivity and User Interaction: One major difference between Chromeless and jsdom lies in their ability to interact with web pages and handle user interaction. Chromeless provides a more robust and comprehensive solution for simulating user actions such as clicking, typing, and scrolling. On the other hand, jsdom is more focused on providing a static HTML parsing and manipulation environment without support for simulating user actions.

  2. Rendering Engine: Chromeless utilizes the Chrome DevTools Protocol and the actual Chrome rendering engine to render web pages, making it capable of accurately replicating the rendering behavior of Chrome. This allows Chromeless to handle complex and dynamic web pages with high fidelity. In contrast, jsdom uses a simplified JavaScript-based rendering engine, which may not fully replicate the rendering behavior of modern browsers like Chrome. Therefore, jsdom may have limited capabilities in handling complex or interactive web pages.

  3. Dependencies and Environment: Chromeless requires a running instance of Google Chrome or a compatible browser for its operation. This means that Chromeless is dependent on the availability of Chrome and may have compatibility issues with other browsers. On the other hand, jsdom is a pure JavaScript library that can be easily integrated into any JavaScript environment, making it more versatile and independent of specific browser dependencies.

  4. Concurrency and Scalability: Chromeless is designed to work as a scalable and highly concurrent system. It can handle multiple browser instances simultaneously and efficiently distribute tasks across them. This makes it suitable for scenarios where high concurrency or performance is required, such as automated testing or web scraping at scale. In contrast, jsdom is primarily a single-threaded library and may not excel in highly concurrent or performance-critical scenarios.

  5. Support for CSS and JavaScript: Chromeless provides comprehensive support for CSS and JavaScript, allowing developers to work with and manipulate styles and behaviors in a web page. It can execute JavaScript code and evaluate CSS selectors, making it a powerful tool for web automation and testing. In comparison, while jsdom supports basic CSS and JavaScript functionality, it may have limitations or inconsistencies in handling advanced CSS features or complex JavaScript interactions.

  6. Community and Documentation: In terms of community support and documentation, Chromeless has a smaller user base compared to jsdom. As a result, there may be fewer online resources, guides, or tutorials available specifically for Chromeless. In contrast, jsdom has a larger and more established community, with a wealth of documentation, examples, and discussions, making it easier to find help or guidance when working with jsdom.

**In Summary, Chromeless offers more advanced interactivity and rendering capabilities, requires specific browser dependencies, is designed for high concurrency, provides comprehensive CSS and JavaScript support, but has a smaller community and documentation compared to jsdom, which focuses on static HTML parsing, is browser-independent, may have limited rendering capabilities, is single-threaded, has basic CSS and JavaScript support, and benefits from a larger community and wealth of documentation.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Chromeless
Pros of jsdom
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 1

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Chromeless?

    Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda.

    What is jsdom?

    It is a pure-JavaScript implementation of many web standards, notably the WHATWG DOM and HTML Standards, for use with Node.js. In general, the goal of the project is to emulate enough of a subset of a web browser to be useful for testing and scraping real-world web applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Chromeless and jsdom as a desired skillset
    What companies use Chromeless?
    What companies use jsdom?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Chromeless or jsdom.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Chromeless?
    What tools integrate with jsdom?
    What are some alternatives to Chromeless and jsdom?
    PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    See all alternatives