Clubhouse vs Skadi: What are the differences?
Developers describe Clubhouse as "Project management built for software teams". Clubhouse combines a simple, modern UI with enterprise-grade tools, allowing technology companies to plan and manage their projects effectively, visualize progress across the organization, and define deadlines and milestones based upon data and predictive modeling. On the other hand, Skadi is detailed as "Self-hosted Trello alternative with a 10 second installation". Skadi doesn't need installation or administration. It's a single static binary file. You don't even need to set up a webserver or a database. Linux and OS X are supported. Windows support is coming soon.
Clubhouse and Skadi can be primarily classified as "Project Management" tools.
What is Clubhouse?
What is Skadi?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Skadi?
What are the cons of using Skadi?
What companies use Skadi?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Skadi?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
We've been really happy with Clubhouse for project organization / task management / kanban board while developing FeaturePeek. The featureset is rich and the UI uncluttered. Clubhouse is different in that it makes some assumptions on how things should be (workflow state, the relationships between stories/epics/milestones, etc). having it be opinionated from the start helps you hit the ground running, while still being editable / extensible for tweaking things to your liking.
The pricing is spot-on too – a flat $10/month for teams of 10 or less. This really made it attractive to us to try out.
If you think Trello is too basic / lightweight but Jira is too full-featured / heavy, you should give Clubhouse a shot – I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.