StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Apache Maven vs CMake

Apache Maven vs CMake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K
CMake
CMake
Stacks4.0K
Followers294
Votes1

Apache Maven vs CMake: What are the differences?

Apache Maven and CMake are two popular build automation tools used in software development, but they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration and Ecosystem: Apache Maven is primarily used for Java projects and has a rich ecosystem with extensive integration with popular Java frameworks and libraries. It uses declarative XML-based configuration files called "pom.xml" to manage project dependencies and define build lifecycles. On the other hand, CMake is a cross-platform build system that supports multiple programming languages, including C, C++, and Fortran. It uses platform-specific build files, such as "CMakeLists.txt," to define project structure, dependencies, and build configurations.

  2. Language Support: While Apache Maven is primarily focused on Java, it can also handle projects in other languages, as long as they can be compiled and packaged using the Java toolchain. CMake, on the other hand, supports a wide range of programming languages and provides built-in support for popular compilers and toolchains.

  3. Build Process: Maven follows a convention-over-configuration approach, where project configurations and build processes are largely predefined and standardized. It employs a "goal-oriented" build system, where predefined goals, such as compile, test, and package, are executed in a specific order. In contrast, CMake allows fine-grained control over the build process by providing a scripting language that allows developers to define custom build rules and dependencies. This makes CMake more flexible and suitable for complex build scenarios.

  4. Platform Independence: Apache Maven is primarily designed for Java projects and provides robust platform independence. It can run on any platform with a Java Virtual Machine (JVM). On the other hand, CMake is designed to be cross-platform and can generate platform-specific build files for different operating systems, making it suitable for projects that need to be built on multiple platforms.

  5. Build Configuration: Maven uses a centralized approach to managing project dependencies and build configurations through its repository system. It relies on the availability of artifacts in remote or local repositories. In contrast, CMake allows developers to directly specify the location of dependencies, giving more control over the build environment.

  6. Community and Adoption: Apache Maven has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available. It is widely adopted in the Java ecosystem and is the de facto build tool for many Java projects. CMake also has a dedicated community and is popular in the C/C++ development community, especially for cross-platform projects.

In summary, Apache Maven and CMake differ in their integration and ecosystem, language support, build process, platform independence, build configuration, and community adoption. These differences make them suitable for different types of projects and development environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
CMake
CMake

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.4K
Stacks
4.0K
Followers
1.7K
Followers
294
Votes
414
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives
Pros
  • 1
    Has package registry

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, CMake?

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana