CMS.js vs Gatsby vs Hugo: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between CMS.js, Gatsby, and Hugo

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Data Handling and Content Management**: CMS.js is designed for simple websites where content changes infrequently and can be managed directly in the HTML or JavaScript files. On the other hand, Gatsby and Hugo are static site generators that use markdown files or external APIs to manage content, making it easier to update and organize content efficiently. 

2. **Themes and Customization**: Gatsby and Hugo offer a wide range of themes and templates that can be easily customized to create unique and dynamic websites. In contrast, CMS.js relies heavily on manual coding and customization for design changes, which can be time-consuming and less flexible.

3. **Performance and Speed**: Gatsby, with its focus on performance optimization and modern web technologies like React, offers faster loading times and better SEO capabilities compared to CMS.js and Hugo. While Hugo also prioritizes performance, Gatsby stands out for its speed and efficiency.

4. **Community and Support**: Gatsby has a vibrant community with extensive documentation, plugins, and developer support, making it easier for users to troubleshoot issues and extend functionality. CMS.js, and to some extent Hugo, may have limited resources and community support in comparison.

5. **Learning Curve and Ease of Use**: CMS.js is beginner-friendly and suitable for small projects due to its simple setup and minimal configuration requirements. In contrast, Gatsby and Hugo have steeper learning curves, especially for beginners, but offer more robust features and capabilities for complex websites and applications.

6. **Scalability and Flexibility**: While all three platforms are scalable, Gatsby's modular architecture and advanced build tools make it more adaptable and suitable for larger projects that require scalability and complex functionality. CMS.js and Hugo may have limitations in scalability and flexibility in comparison.

In Summary, the key differences between CMS.js, Gatsby, and Hugo lie in their approach to data handling, customization, performance, community support, ease of use, and scalability. Each platform offers unique strengths and capabilities tailored to different project requirements.