Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CockroachDB vs CouchDB: What are the differences?
CockroachDB vs CouchDB
CockroachDB and CouchDB are both popular database management systems, but they have key differences that set them apart. Here are six important distinctions:
1. Data Model:
CockroachDB follows a tabular, schema-based data model that resembles traditional relational databases. It enforces a strict schema and supports ACID transactions, ensuring data consistency. On the other hand, CouchDB follows a document-oriented data model, where data is stored as JSON documents. It is schema-less, allowing for more flexibility in terms of data structure.
2. Scalability:
CockroachDB is designed for horizontal scalability and distributed deployments. It employs a distributed SQL engine that automatically replicates data across multiple nodes, offering high availability and fault tolerance. In contrast, CouchDB is primarily focused on single-node deployments, making it less ideal for large-scale distributed systems.
3. Query Language:
CockroachDB uses a SQL-like language for querying and manipulating data, making it familiar to developers experienced with relational databases. It supports traditional SQL operations like JOINs and complex queries. In contrast, CouchDB utilizes a MapReduce-based querying system, which requires a different approach to data retrieval and analysis.
4. Consistency vs Eventual Consistency:
CockroachDB ensures strict consistency by employing distributed consensus algorithms, which means that data is always up-to-date across all replicas. In contrast, CouchDB adopts an eventual consistency model, where changes made to the database may take some time to propagate across replicas, leading to the possibility of data divergence for a short period.
5. Conflict Resolution:
In CouchDB, conflict resolution is built-in to handle conflicts that may arise when concurrent edits are made to the same document. It uses a combination of revision IDs and conflict handlers to automatically detect and resolve conflicts. In CockroachDB, conflict resolution is primarily handled through timestamping and the underlying distributed consensus protocols.
6. Replication:
CockroachDB supports synchronous and asynchronous replication options, allowing for flexibility in ensuring data durability and performance. It replicates data in a strongly consistent manner across multiple nodes. In contrast, CouchDB supports only asynchronous replication, which means that data replication occurs after changes have been made locally.
In summary, CockroachDB follows a strict schema-based data model, is highly scalable and offers strong consistency, while CouchDB adopts a flexible schema-less data model, focuses on single-node deployments, and offers eventual consistency.
We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .
Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.
It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.
Pros of CockroachDB
Pros of CouchDB
- JSON43
- Open source30
- Highly available18
- Partition tolerant12
- Eventual consistency11
- Sync7
- REST API5
- Attachments mechanism to docs4
- Multi master replication4
- Changes feed3
- REST interface1
- js- and erlang-views1