Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CocoaLumberjack vs Loki: What are the differences?
Developers describe CocoaLumberjack as "A fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS". CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS. On the other hand, Loki is detailed as "Like Prometheus, but for logs (by the makers of Grafana)". Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.
CocoaLumberjack and Loki can be primarily classified as "Logging" tools.
CocoaLumberjack and Loki are both open source tools. CocoaLumberjack with 11.4K GitHub stars and 1.97K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Loki with 6.48K GitHub stars and 364 GitHub forks.
Pros of CocoaLumberjack
Pros of Loki
- Opensource5
- Very fast ingestion3
- Near real-time search3
- Low resource footprint2
- REST Api2
- Smart way of tagging1
- Perfect fit for k8s1