CocoaLumberjack vs Loki

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CocoaLumberjack

28
30
+ 1
0
Loki

278
244
+ 1
16
Add tool

CocoaLumberjack vs Loki: What are the differences?

Developers describe CocoaLumberjack as "A fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS". CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS. On the other hand, Loki is detailed as "Like Prometheus, but for logs (by the makers of Grafana)". Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

CocoaLumberjack and Loki can be primarily classified as "Logging" tools.

CocoaLumberjack and Loki are both open source tools. CocoaLumberjack with 11.4K GitHub stars and 1.97K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Loki with 6.48K GitHub stars and 364 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CocoaLumberjack
Pros of Loki
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 5
      Opensource
    • 3
      Near real-time search
    • 2
      REST Api
    • 2
      Very fast ingestion
    • 2
      Low resource footprint
    • 1
      Smart way of tagging
    • 1
      Perfect fit for k8s

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is CocoaLumberjack?

    CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

    What is Loki?

    Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use CocoaLumberjack?
    What companies use Loki?
    See which teams inside your own company are using CocoaLumberjack or Loki.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with CocoaLumberjack?
    What tools integrate with Loki?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to CocoaLumberjack and Loki?
    SwiftyBeaver
    It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.
    Log4j
    It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.
    Castle Core
    It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.
    Bunyan
    It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)
    Seq
    Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.
    See all alternatives