StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Codacy vs Codebrag vs Coverity Scan

Codacy vs Codebrag vs Coverity Scan

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codebrag
Codebrag
Stacks7
Followers32
Votes1
Codacy
Codacy
Stacks313
Followers551
Votes248
Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
Stacks50
Followers185
Votes0

Codacy vs Codebrag vs Coverity Scan: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with Development Tools: Codacy offers seamless integrations with popular development tools such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing for a smooth incorporation of code analysis into existing workflows. Codebrag also provides integrations with these tools, but Coverity Scan is more focused on standalone code analysis and requires additional effort for integration into development cycles.

  2. Code Analysis Capabilities: Codacy and Codebrag primarily focus on automated code review and static code analysis, providing insights into code quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices. Coverity Scan, on the other hand, offers both static and dynamic code analysis tools that detect defects and security vulnerabilities at a deeper level, allowing for comprehensive code assessment.

  3. Scalability and Customization Options: Codacy and Codebrag are well-suited for small to medium-sized development teams due to their user-friendly interfaces and scalability options. Coverity Scan, however, is more geared towards large enterprises with complex codebases, offering extensive customization capabilities and support for diverse programming languages.

  4. Cost and Pricing Models: Codacy and Codebrag have flexible pricing models based on the number of users or repositories, making them accessible to teams of various sizes. Coverity Scan, being a premium enterprise-level tool, comes with higher costs and licensing fees, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: Codacy and Codebrag have active online communities and comprehensive documentation resources that enable users to troubleshoot issues and learn best practices easily. While Coverity Scan offers extensive technical support from their team, community engagement and knowledge-sharing opportunities are comparatively limited.

  6. Focus on Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): Codacy and Codebrag emphasize seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines to automate code review and quality checks throughout the development lifecycle. Coverity Scan, while also supporting CI/CD workflows, places more emphasis on thorough code analysis and security checks rather than integration with deployment processes.

In Summary, Codacy and Codebrag are user-friendly code analysis tools with a focus on automated review and static analysis, while Coverity Scan offers comprehensive code assessment capabilities for large enterprises with a higher emphasis on in-depth defect detection and security analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codebrag
Codebrag
Codacy
Codacy
Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan

Codebrag saves you time with well‑organized and enjoyable code reviews. A simple dashboard combined with a game‑like experience brings fun to the process and makes it work for your team. Codebrag gamifies the experience with achievements, leader boards, gravatars and 'Likes' for the code. Codebrag is built by developers with over 10 years experience in programming, working on projects all over the world. It is developed with passion answering a real need to make code reviews an easier and more pleasant experience.

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.

Easily manage all commits and comments in one place;Track your tasks with a simple To‑Do list;Allow great code to be praised and have fun while doing reviews.;Transparent diffs in the same window, in-line comments, perfect keyboard navigation – we’ve done everything to make it light and seamless;No more e-mails with comments on comments, with Codebrag it’s simple: everything is in one place – you see commits, comments and diffs all in one place;Codebrag offers full IDE integration, but it can also be installed locally. All the changes and comments appear in your SCM.
Available for cloud and self-hosted repositories;Static code analysis for +40 languages;Analysis for cloud infrastructure-as-code frameworks;Automatic analysis integrated in your CI;Code coverage tracking;Support for linter configuration files;1-click autofixes for GitHub;Static IP addresses for allowlisting Codacy;
Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Statistics
Stacks
7
Stacks
313
Stacks
50
Followers
32
Followers
551
Followers
185
Votes
1
Votes
248
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Simple, SVN support, easy install and free
Pros
  • 45
    Automated code review
  • 35
    Easy setup
  • 29
    Free for open source
  • 20
    Customizable
  • 18
    Helps reduce technical debt
Cons
  • 6
    No support for private Git or Azure DevOps git
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Jira
Jira
GitHub
GitHub
Travis CI
Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Codebrag, Codacy, Coverity Scan?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana