Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CodeceptJS

103
217
+ 1
52
Selenium

15.6K
12.4K
+ 1
527
Add tool

CodeceptJS vs Selenium: What are the differences?

CodeceptJS vs Selenium

CodeceptJS and Selenium are both popular tools used for web automation testing. While they share the same goal, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. CodeceptJS: CodeceptJS is a modern end-to-end testing framework that combines the best of various testing libraries like WebDriverIO, Protractor, etc. It allows you to write tests using simple and intuitive APIs, providing an easy-to-understand syntax that needs minimal coding skills. CodeceptJS utilizes the page object pattern, making it easier to manage and maintain test code.

  2. Selenium: Selenium, on the other hand, is a widely used open-source web browser automation tool. It provides a range of language bindings, including Java, C#, Python, etc. Selenium offers a more traditional approach to web automation testing, requiring developers to have a good understanding of programming and coding concepts.

  3. Code Organization: CodeceptJS organizes tests using "actors," allowing you to define multiple actors with their own actions and interactions. This makes it easier to create more realistic test scenarios and handle complex user interactions. Selenium does not provide such a built-in concept of actors, requiring developers to manage test organization themselves.

  4. Browser Support: CodeceptJS supports multiple browsers out of the box, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc. It also supports headless browsers like Puppeteer. Selenium, being a more mature tool, has extensive browser support and compatibility and offers more advanced features like grid testing.

  5. Test Writing: CodeceptJS promotes a more human-readable style of test writing, using simple keywords and phrases to define test steps. It provides various built-in helper methods and plugins, making the test writing process quicker and easier. On the other hand, Selenium requires developers to write more traditional code, with explicit method calls and conversions.

  6. Integrated Testing: CodeceptJS offers built-in support for functional, acceptance, and API testing. It provides easy integration with popular testing frameworks like Mocha, Jasmine, etc., allowing you to perform end-to-end testing effortlessly. Selenium focuses primarily on web browser automation and requires additional frameworks or tools for API testing.

In Summary, CodeceptJS provides a more simplified and powerful approach to web automation testing, with its intuitive syntax, actor-based organization, and integrated testing capabilities. Selenium, on the other hand, offers a more traditional approach with extensive browser support and flexibility.

Advice on CodeceptJS and Selenium
Needs advice
on
JestJestSeleniumSelenium
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO
in

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

See more
Replies (1)
Prashanth Marappa
Senior Software Engineer at Mphasis · | 1 upvotes · 225.7K views
Recommends
on
SeleniumSelenium

with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of CodeceptJS
Pros of Selenium
  • 10
    Readability
  • 9
    Full browser control
  • 9
    Cross browser support
  • 8
    Open source
  • 6
    Community
  • 5
    Flexible Driver
  • 3
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Agnostic
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 8
    Data crawling
  • 7
    Supports end to end testing
  • 6
    Easy set up
  • 6
    Functional testing
  • 4
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 3
    End to End Testing
  • 3
    Easy to integrate with build tools
  • 2
    Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
  • 2
    Record and playback
  • 2
    Compatible with Python
  • 2
    Easy to scale
  • 2
    Integration Tests
  • 0
    Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of CodeceptJS
Cons of Selenium
  • 2
    Small community
  • 1
    Not a framework by itself
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is CodeceptJS?

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

What is Selenium?

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use CodeceptJS?
What companies use Selenium?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with CodeceptJS?
What tools integrate with Selenium?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to CodeceptJS and Selenium?
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
Codeception
Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.
TestCafe
It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Protractor
Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
See all alternatives