Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CodeceptJS vs Selenium: What are the differences?
CodeceptJS vs Selenium
CodeceptJS and Selenium are both popular tools used for web automation testing. While they share the same goal, there are some key differences between the two.
CodeceptJS: CodeceptJS is a modern end-to-end testing framework that combines the best of various testing libraries like WebDriverIO, Protractor, etc. It allows you to write tests using simple and intuitive APIs, providing an easy-to-understand syntax that needs minimal coding skills. CodeceptJS utilizes the page object pattern, making it easier to manage and maintain test code.
Selenium: Selenium, on the other hand, is a widely used open-source web browser automation tool. It provides a range of language bindings, including Java, C#, Python, etc. Selenium offers a more traditional approach to web automation testing, requiring developers to have a good understanding of programming and coding concepts.
Code Organization: CodeceptJS organizes tests using "actors," allowing you to define multiple actors with their own actions and interactions. This makes it easier to create more realistic test scenarios and handle complex user interactions. Selenium does not provide such a built-in concept of actors, requiring developers to manage test organization themselves.
Browser Support: CodeceptJS supports multiple browsers out of the box, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc. It also supports headless browsers like Puppeteer. Selenium, being a more mature tool, has extensive browser support and compatibility and offers more advanced features like grid testing.
Test Writing: CodeceptJS promotes a more human-readable style of test writing, using simple keywords and phrases to define test steps. It provides various built-in helper methods and plugins, making the test writing process quicker and easier. On the other hand, Selenium requires developers to write more traditional code, with explicit method calls and conversions.
Integrated Testing: CodeceptJS offers built-in support for functional, acceptance, and API testing. It provides easy integration with popular testing frameworks like Mocha, Jasmine, etc., allowing you to perform end-to-end testing effortlessly. Selenium focuses primarily on web browser automation and requires additional frameworks or tools for API testing.
In Summary, CodeceptJS provides a more simplified and powerful approach to web automation testing, with its intuitive syntax, actor-based organization, and integrated testing capabilities. Selenium, on the other hand, offers a more traditional approach with extensive browser support and flexibility.
we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................
with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing
Pros of CodeceptJS
- Readability10
- Full browser control9
- Cross browser support9
- Open source8
- Community6
- Flexible Driver5
- Great documentation3
- Agnostic2
Pros of Selenium
- Automates browsers177
- Testing154
- Essential tool for running test automation101
- Record-Playback24
- Remote Control24
- Data crawling8
- Supports end to end testing7
- Easy set up6
- Functional testing6
- The Most flexible monitoring system4
- End to End Testing3
- Easy to integrate with build tools3
- Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm2
- Record and playback2
- Compatible with Python2
- Easy to scale2
- Integration Tests2
- Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CodeceptJS
- Small community2
- Not a framework by itself1
Cons of Selenium
- Flaky tests8
- Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)4
- Update browser drivers2