StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Coverage
  4. Code Coverage
  5. Codecov vs Coveralls

Codecov vs Coveralls

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Coveralls
Coveralls
Stacks1.7K
Followers278
Votes68
Codecov
Codecov
Stacks2.8K
Followers324
Votes102

Codecov vs Coveralls: What are the differences?

Codecov vs Coveralls

Code coverage tools play a crucial role in the software development process. Two popular options are Codecov and Coveralls. While both aim to measure and track code coverage, there are several key differences between them:

  1. Integration and Platform Support: Codecov supports a wide range of languages and platforms, including popular ones like Java, JavaScript, Python, and Ruby. On the other hand, Coveralls has limited language support, primarily focusing on Ruby, JavaScript, and Python.

  2. Interface and User Experience: Codecov offers a comprehensive and user-friendly interface with various features like pull request integration, code commenting, and visual coverage reports. Coveralls, on the other hand, has a simpler interface with basic features and less intuitive navigation.

  3. Integrations and Ecosystem: Codecov integrates seamlessly with popular code hosting platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket. It also has extensive integration options with various CI/CD tools. While Coveralls also supports GitHub integration, it lacks the same level of integrations with other code hosting and CI/CD platforms.

  4. Metrics and Analysis: Codecov provides detailed metrics, allowing developers to measure not only overall code coverage but also specific coverage metrics like line, branch, and function coverage. Coveralls, however, focuses primarily on overall coverage percentage, lacking more granular metrics.

  5. Security and Privacy: Codecov offers advanced security features like token scanning, secret detection, and security advisories, ensuring the protection of sensitive data. While Coveralls ensures the privacy of code coverage reports, it doesn't provide the same level of security features as Codecov.

  6. Pricing and Plans: Codecov offers a free tier with limited functionality and additional paid plans that unlock advanced features. Coveralls also has a free plan but its features are more limited, and it primarily offers paid plans for teams or organizations.

In summary, Codecov and Coveralls differ in terms of integration and platform support, interface and user experience, integrations and ecosystem, metrics and analysis capabilities, security and privacy measures, as well as pricing and plans. Making a choice between the two ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Coveralls, Codecov

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Coveralls
Coveralls
Codecov
Codecov

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview
Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration
Statistics
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
2.8K
Followers
278
Followers
324
Votes
68
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Free for public repositories
  • 13
    Code coverage
  • 7
    Ease of integration
  • 2
    More stable than Codecov
  • 1
    Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs
Pros
  • 17
    Easy setup
  • 17
    More stable than coveralls
  • 14
    GitHub integration
  • 11
    They reply their users
  • 10
    Easy setup,great ui
Cons
  • 1
    GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight
  • 0
    Support does not respond to email
  • 0
    Delayed results by hours since recent outage
Integrations
Travis CI
Travis CI
CircleCI
CircleCI
Semaphore
Semaphore
Jenkins
Jenkins
Codeship
Codeship
HipChat
HipChat
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Heroku
Heroku

What are some alternatives to Coveralls, Codecov?

Istanbul

Istanbul

It is a JS code coverage tool that computes statement, line, function and branch coverage with module loader hooks to transparently add coverage when running tests. Supports all JS coverage use cases including unit tests, server side functional tests and browser tests. Built for scale.

uberalls

uberalls

Code coverage metric storage service. Provide coverage metrics on differentials with Phabricator and Jenkins, just like Coveralls does for GitHub and TravisCI.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana