Codeship vs GoCD

Overview

Codeship

Stacks1.0K

Followers730

Votes1.5K

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

Codeship vs GoCD: What are the differences?

Version Control Integration: Codeship has integrations with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it easier for developers to automatically trigger builds and deploys based on code changes. Meanwhile, GoCD also supports version control integration but has a more flexible plugin system, allowing users to integrate with a wider range of tools and systems.
Pipeline Configuration: Codeship uses a YAML-based configuration to define build pipelines, which simplifies the setup process and enables developers to quickly get started with automated build processes. In contrast, GoCD has a more complex pipeline configuration with a graphical user interface that offers a high level of customization and control over the build process, suitable for more advanced users with specific requirements.
Scalability and Performance: Codeship is a cloud-based continuous integration platform that offers scalability based on the selected plan, accommodating teams of different sizes and needs. On the other hand, GoCD is a self-hosted solution that provides better performance and control over resources, making it suitable for organizations with strict security and compliance requirements.
User Interface: Codeship features a user-friendly and intuitive web interface that allows users to monitor build status, view logs, and manage pipelines with ease. In comparison, GoCD has a more traditional user interface that can be more challenging to navigate for new users but offers extensive customization options for experienced users.
Third-Party Integrations: Codeship offers integrations with a wide range of third-party tools and services, such as Slack, JIRA, and Docker, to enhance the continuous integration and deployment process. In contrast, GoCD has a more limited selection of built-in integrations but provides a robust plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend functionality as needed.
Community Support and Documentation: Codeship has a strong online community and extensive documentation resources to help users troubleshoot issues and get started with the platform quickly. While GoCD also offers community support, its documentation may be less comprehensive, requiring users to rely more on community forums and user-generated content for assistance.

In Summary, Codeship and GoCD differ in terms of version control integration, pipeline configuration, scalability and performance, user interface, third-party integrations, and community support and documentation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Codeship, GoCD

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codeship	GoCD
Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.	GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.
Run you automated tests \| Easily set up Codeship with Github or Bitbucket and trigger your automated tests with a simple push to your repository.; 100 builds & 5 private projects free per month.;Free for OSS.;Configure deployment pipelines \| Set up powerful deployment pipelines that let you deploy with ease and confidence multiple times a day.;Notifications \| Intelligent notifications and integrations keep your team up-to-date.;SSH debug access \| Easily ssh into a debug build to get more insights.;Use your resources to build amazing products. Codeship takes care of managing and scaling your test and delivery infrastructure.	Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 980
Stacks 1.0K	Stacks 205
Followers 730	Followers 325
Votes 1.5K	Votes 207
Pros & Cons
Pros 215 Simple deployments 179 Easy setup 159 Github integration 147 Continuous deployment 110 Bitbucket integration Cons 3 Ui could use some polishing 0 Antiquated ui 0 Difficult to answer build questions	Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support
Integrations
Slack GitLab CI GitHub HipChat Google Compute Engine Ninefold Amazon EC2 Google App Engine AWS CodeDeploy Bitbucket	Docker Kubernetes Slack

What are some alternatives to Codeship, GoCD?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Related Comparisons

Codeship vs GoCD: What are the differences?

Version Control Integration: Codeship has integrations with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it easier for developers to automatically trigger builds and deploys based on code changes. Meanwhile, GoCD also supports version control integration but has a more flexible plugin system, allowing users to integrate with a wider range of tools and systems.
Pipeline Configuration: Codeship uses a YAML-based configuration to define build pipelines, which simplifies the setup process and enables developers to quickly get started with automated build processes. In contrast, GoCD has a more complex pipeline configuration with a graphical user interface that offers a high level of customization and control over the build process, suitable for more advanced users with specific requirements.
Scalability and Performance: Codeship is a cloud-based continuous integration platform that offers scalability based on the selected plan, accommodating teams of different sizes and needs. On the other hand, GoCD is a self-hosted solution that provides better performance and control over resources, making it suitable for organizations with strict security and compliance requirements.
User Interface: Codeship features a user-friendly and intuitive web interface that allows users to monitor build status, view logs, and manage pipelines with ease. In comparison, GoCD has a more traditional user interface that can be more challenging to navigate for new users but offers extensive customization options for experienced users.
Third-Party Integrations: Codeship offers integrations with a wide range of third-party tools and services, such as Slack, JIRA, and Docker, to enhance the continuous integration and deployment process. In contrast, GoCD has a more limited selection of built-in integrations but provides a robust plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend functionality as needed.
Community Support and Documentation: Codeship has a strong online community and extensive documentation resources to help users troubleshoot issues and get started with the platform quickly. While GoCD also offers community support, its documentation may be less comprehensive, requiring users to rely more on community forums and user-generated content for assistance.

Codeship vs GoCD

Overview