Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Codeship vs Heroku CI: What are the differences?
Introduction: In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Codeship and Heroku CI, two popular continuous integration tools used by developers.
Deployment Options: Codeship primarily focuses on continuous integration and deployment, offering built-in deployment pipelines to various platforms such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku. In contrast, Heroku CI is a testing-focused tool integrated with the Heroku platform, which allows for seamless deployment to the Heroku cloud platform only.
Customizability: Codeship provides a high level of customization with the ability to create custom scripts and integrations to tailor the CI/CD processes to specific project needs. On the other hand, Heroku CI offers less flexibility in customization, as it is more tightly integrated with the Heroku platform and follows a more opinionated approach to continuous integration.
Pricing Structure: Codeship offers flexible pricing plans based on the number of parallel builds and the resources required, making it suitable for teams of different sizes. In contrast, Heroku CI is part of the Heroku platform, and its pricing is closely tied to the usage of Heroku dynos and other resources within the Heroku ecosystem.
Workflow Automation: Codeship allows users to automate workflows through features like parallel test execution, deployment pipelines, and integrations with popular tools like Slack and GitHub. Heroku CI also supports workflow automation but is more tailored towards the Heroku platform, offering seamless integration with Heroku pipelines for continuous delivery.
Community and Support: Codeship boasts a large and active community of developers, extensive documentation, and responsive customer support to assist users with any issues or queries. Heroku CI, being part of the Heroku platform, benefits from the support and resources provided by the broader Heroku ecosystem and community.
In Summary, Codeship and Heroku CI differ in deployment options, customizability, pricing structure, workflow automation capabilities, and community support.
Pros of Codeship
- Simple deployments215
- Easy setup179
- Github integration159
- Continuous deployment147
- Bitbucket integration110
- Easy ui97
- Slack integration84
- Fast builds66
- Great ui61
- Great customer support61
- SSH debug access28
- Free plan for 5 private repositories27
- Easy to get started27
- Competitively priced23
- Notifications20
- Hipchat, Campfire integrations20
- Awesome UI16
- Fast15
- Great documentation14
- Great experience13
- Free for open source12
- Great Tutorials10
- GitLab integration4
- Free4
- Easy to use, above all and its free for basic use4
- Easy for CI first timers3
- BitBucket Support3
- Very easy to get started3
- Build private Github repos on the free plan3
- Awesome3
- Super easy setup, works great with py.test/tox2
- Openshift integration2
- Great support, even on free tier2
- AppEngine integration2
- Easy debugging with ssh2
- Integrates with other free software2
- Superfast team work integration2
- Grepping Codeship = 1 day. Grepping Bamboo = 1 month2
- Easy to set up, very nice GitHub integration2
- Up and running in few minutes, and above all UI2
Pros of Heroku CI
- No waiting in the queue3
- Best in class pipeline integration1
- Consolidated Heroku billing1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Codeship
- Ui could use some polishing3
- Antiquated ui0
- Difficult to answer build questions0
Cons of Heroku CI
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Codeship?
What is Heroku CI?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Codeship?
What companies use Heroku CI?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Codeship?
What tools integrate with Heroku CI?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+24
+20