Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Codeship

1.1K
730
+ 1
1.5K
wercker

366
156
+ 1
242
Add tool

Codeship vs wercker: What are the differences?

What is Codeship? A Continuous Integration Platform in the cloud. Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

What is wercker? Build, test, and deploy container-native applications. Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Codeship and wercker belong to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Codeship are:

  • Run you automated tests | Easily set up Codeship with Github or Bitbucket and trigger your automated tests with a simple push to your repository.
  • 100 builds & 5 private projects free per month.
  • Free for OSS.

On the other hand, wercker provides the following key features:

  • Pipelines - Wercker's Pipelines enable developers to fully automate builds, tests and deployments with Docker as a first class citizen.
  • Workflows - With Workflows: a collection of pipelines can be chained and triggered to achieve complex automation goals.
  • Steps Store - A step is a self contained best practice for accomplishing a specific automation task. Build your own or help yourself to our community based store.

"Simple deployments" is the primary reason why developers consider Codeship over the competitors, whereas "Automatic Deployments" was stated as the key factor in picking wercker.

Product Hunt, InVisionApp, and Soylent are some of the popular companies that use Codeship, whereas wercker is used by AX Semantics, DataHero, and creative box Inc. Codeship has a broader approval, being mentioned in 278 company stacks & 82 developers stacks; compared to wercker, which is listed in 40 company stacks and 23 developer stacks.

Decisions about Codeship and wercker
Vladyslav Holubiev
Sr. Directory of Technology at Shelf · | 3 upvotes · 51.5K views
Migrated
from
werckerwercker
to
CircleCICircleCI
at
()

We migrated all our CI/CD pipelines to CircleCI back in 2017 and are particularly happy about it since!

Our top loved feature is unlimited parallelism. We can run as many builds concurrently as we want.

We also use orbs, pipeline parameters, reusable commands, build cache, test insights.

For some of the heavier repos, we use a larger resource class and mount RAMdisk to a file system to speed up builds.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Codeship
Pros of wercker
  • 215
    Simple deployments
  • 179
    Easy setup
  • 159
    Github integration
  • 147
    Continuous deployment
  • 110
    Bitbucket integration
  • 97
    Easy ui
  • 84
    Slack integration
  • 66
    Fast builds
  • 61
    Great ui
  • 61
    Great customer support
  • 28
    SSH debug access
  • 27
    Free plan for 5 private repositories
  • 27
    Easy to get started
  • 23
    Competitively priced
  • 20
    Notifications
  • 20
    Hipchat, Campfire integrations
  • 16
    Awesome UI
  • 15
    Fast
  • 14
    Great documentation
  • 13
    Great experience
  • 12
    Free for open source
  • 10
    Great Tutorials
  • 4
    GitLab integration
  • 4
    Free
  • 4
    Easy to use, above all and its free for basic use
  • 3
    Easy for CI first timers
  • 3
    BitBucket Support
  • 3
    Very easy to get started
  • 3
    Build private Github repos on the free plan
  • 3
    Awesome
  • 2
    Super easy setup, works great with py.test/tox
  • 2
    Openshift integration
  • 2
    Great support, even on free tier
  • 2
    AppEngine integration
  • 2
    Easy debugging with ssh
  • 2
    Integrates with other free software
  • 2
    Superfast team work integration
  • 2
    Grepping Codeship = 1 day. Grepping Bamboo = 1 month
  • 2
    Easy to set up, very nice GitHub integration
  • 2
    Up and running in few minutes, and above all UI
  • 35
    Automatic Deployments
  • 33
    Free
  • 25
    Easy config via yaml
  • 23
    Awesome UI
  • 23
    Github integration
  • 22
    Continuous Deployment
  • 16
    Supports both Github and Bitbucket
  • 14
    Easy to setup
  • 12
    Reliable
  • 11
    Bitbucket Integration
  • 4
    Community-driven components (boxes and steps)
  • 4
    Fast builds
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 4
    Docker based
  • 3
    Easy UI
  • 3
    Flexible configuration via YAML
  • 2
    Multi-target deploys
  • 1
    Trigger by branch name
  • 1
    Great UI, free and an active Slack channel :)
  • 1
    Docker support
  • 1
    Multiple configurable build steps

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Codeship
Cons of wercker
  • 3
    Ui could use some polishing
  • 0
    Antiquated ui
  • 0
    Difficult to answer build questions
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Codeship?

    Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

    What is wercker?

    Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Codeship and wercker as a desired skillset
    What companies use Codeship?
    What companies use wercker?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Codeship?
    What tools integrate with wercker?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubPythonDocker+24
    13
    17218
    What are some alternatives to Codeship and wercker?
    CircleCI
    Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
    Semaphore
    Semaphore is the fastest continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform on the market, powering the world’s best engineering teams.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Shippable
    Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.
    Codefresh
    Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.
    See all alternatives