Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CoffeeScript vs Groovy: What are the differences?
Developers describe CoffeeScript as "Unfancy JavaScript". CoffeeScript is a little language that compiles into JavaScript. Underneath that awkward Java-esque patina, JavaScript has always had a gorgeous heart. CoffeeScript is an attempt to expose the good parts of JavaScript in a simple way. On the other hand, Groovy is detailed as "A dynamic language for the Java platform". Groovy builds upon the strengths of Java but has additional power features inspired by languages like Python, Ruby and Smalltalk. It makes modern programming features available to Java developers with almost-zero learning curve.
CoffeeScript and Groovy belong to "Languages" category of the tech stack.
"Easy to read" is the primary reason why developers consider CoffeeScript over the competitors, whereas "Java platform" was stated as the key factor in picking Groovy.
CoffeeScript and Groovy are both open source tools. CoffeeScript with 15.2K GitHub stars and 1.99K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Groovy with 1.49K GitHub stars and 414 GitHub forks.
Code School, Zaarly, and thoughtbot are some of the popular companies that use CoffeeScript, whereas Groovy is used by Starbucks, Cask, and PedidosYa. CoffeeScript has a broader approval, being mentioned in 364 company stacks & 169 developers stacks; compared to Groovy, which is listed in 78 company stacks and 73 developer stacks.
Pros of CoffeeScript
- Easy to read199
- Faster to write179
- Syntactic sugar126
- Readable104
- Elegant104
- Pretty73
- Javascript the good parts53
- Open source48
- Classes44
- "it's just javascript"35
- Compact code16
- Easy15
- Simple13
- Not Javascript13
- Does the same with less code2
- I'm jobs I'm software engineer1
Pros of Groovy
- Java platform44
- Much more productive than java33
- Concise and readable29
- Very little code needed for complex tasks28
- Dynamic language22
- Nice dynamic syntax for the jvm13
- Very fast9
- Can work with JSON as an object7
- Easy to setup7
- Supports closures (lambdas)6
- Literal Collections6
- Syntactic sugar3
- Optional static typing3
- Developer Friendly2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CoffeeScript
- No ES63
- Corner cases in syntax1
- Parentheses required in 0-ary function calls1
- Unclear what will be grouped to {…}1
Cons of Groovy
- Groovy Code can be slower than Java Code3
- Absurd syntax1
- Objects cause stateful/heap mess1