Conan vs Docker

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Conan

Stacks84

Followers108

Votes10

GitHub Stars9.0K

Forks1.1K

Conan vs Docker: What are the differences?

Conan: Conan is an open-source C/C++ package manager that allows developers to easily manage dependencies and build systems for their projects.
Docker: Docker is an open-source platform that allows developers to automate the deployment of applications inside software containers.
Package Management: Conan focuses specifically on package management for C/C++ projects. It provides a comprehensive solution for managing dependencies, including version control, binary uploads, and package sharing. On the other hand, Docker is a more general-purpose platform that can be used with multiple programming languages and technologies.
Isolation and Portability: One of the key differences between Conan and Docker is their approach to isolation and portability. Docker provides a high level of isolation by running applications in lightweight containers, which ensures consistency across different environments. Conan, on the other hand, manages dependencies at the project level, allowing for greater control and flexibility but potentially requiring more effort to ensure portability across different environments.
Build Systems: Conan integrates with popular build systems like CMake and Make to manage the build process and handle dependencies seamlessly. It provides an easy-to-use configuration interface that allows developers to define dependencies, specify versions, and manage build configurations. Docker, on the other hand, abstracts away the build system and provides a unified runtime environment, making it easier to package and deploy applications.
Deployment and Scaling: Docker provides a powerful platform for deploying and scaling applications across different environments and infrastructure. It allows developers to define application stacks and deploy them in a consistent and reproducible manner. Conan, on the other hand, focuses more on managing dependencies and build systems, providing a solid foundation for the development process but requiring additional tools and platforms for deployment and scaling.

In summary, Conan and Docker have distinct focuses and serve different purposes. Conan is a package manager specifically designed for C/C++ projects, providing comprehensive dependency management and build system integration. Docker, on the other hand, is a general-purpose platform that automates the deployment of applications inside containers, offering isolation, portability, and scalability across different environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Conan

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Conan
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Install or build your own packages for any platform. Conan also allows you to run your own server easily from the command line.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Dependencies and package management for developers; De-centralized; Source code and binaries; Full open-source stack; Simple, flexible and powerful scripting; Full control of dependencies; Free hosting service for free software;
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 9.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 84
Followers 143.8K	Followers 108
Votes 3.9K	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 4 Crossplatform builds 3 Easy to maintain used dependencies 2 Build recipes can be very flexble 1 Integrations with cmake, qmake and other build systems Cons 1 3rd party recipes can be flawed
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	C lang C++

What are some alternatives to Docker, Conan?

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Gemfury

Hosted service for your private and custom packages to simplify your deployment story. Once you upload your packages and enable your Gemfury repository, you can securely deploy any package to any host. Your private RubyGems, Python packages, and NPM modules will be safe and within reach on Gemfury. Install them to any machine in minutes without worrying about running and securing your own private repository.<br>

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

PyPI

It is a repository of software for the Python programming language. It helps you find and install software developed and shared by the Python community. Package authors use it to distribute their software.

Studio 3T

It's the only MongoDB tool that provides three ways to explore data alongside powerful features like query autocompletion, polyglot code generation, a stage-by-stage aggregation query builder, import and export, SQL query support and more.

Dist

Docker Container Registries and Maven Repositories hosted in the cloud. Offering private, protected, and public repositories, Dist is the simplest way to share and distribute artifacts across your team, systems, and customers.

aptly

aptly is a swiss army knife for Debian repository management: it allows you to mirror remote repositories, manage local package repositories, take snapshots, pull new versions of packages along with dependencies, publish as Debian repository.

Related Comparisons

Conan vs Docker: What are the differences?

Conan: Conan is an open-source C/C++ package manager that allows developers to easily manage dependencies and build systems for their projects.
Docker: Docker is an open-source platform that allows developers to automate the deployment of applications inside software containers.
Package Management: Conan focuses specifically on package management for C/C++ projects. It provides a comprehensive solution for managing dependencies, including version control, binary uploads, and package sharing. On the other hand, Docker is a more general-purpose platform that can be used with multiple programming languages and technologies.
Isolation and Portability: One of the key differences between Conan and Docker is their approach to isolation and portability. Docker provides a high level of isolation by running applications in lightweight containers, which ensures consistency across different environments. Conan, on the other hand, manages dependencies at the project level, allowing for greater control and flexibility but potentially requiring more effort to ensure portability across different environments.
Build Systems: Conan integrates with popular build systems like CMake and Make to manage the build process and handle dependencies seamlessly. It provides an easy-to-use configuration interface that allows developers to define dependencies, specify versions, and manage build configurations. Docker, on the other hand, abstracts away the build system and provides a unified runtime environment, making it easier to package and deploy applications.
Deployment and Scaling: Docker provides a powerful platform for deploying and scaling applications across different environments and infrastructure. It allows developers to define application stacks and deploy them in a consistent and reproducible manner. Conan, on the other hand, focuses more on managing dependencies and build systems, providing a solid foundation for the development process but requiring additional tools and platforms for deployment and scaling.

Conan vs Docker

Overview