StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Concourse vs TeamCity

Concourse vs TeamCity

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Concourse
Concourse
Stacks254
Followers393
Votes54
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks870

Concourse vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Concourse and TeamCity

Concourse and TeamCity are both popular continuous integration and continuous delivery tools used in the software development process. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that can affect the choice of tool for a particular project. 

1. **Architecture**: Concourse follows a container-based architecture, where each job runs inside its own isolated container, ensuring that builds are reproducible and consistent. On the other hand, TeamCity uses build agents on traditional servers to execute build jobs, which can lead to potential conflicts or inconsistencies in build environments.

2. **Configuration Management**: Concourse relies on a pipeline declarative configuration format written in YAML, making it easier to define, version control, and maintain build pipelines. TeamCity, on the other hand, uses a web UI for configuring build jobs, which can be less transparent and harder to track changes over time.

3. **Dependency Handling**: Concourse has built-in support for managing job dependencies and ensuring that tasks run only when their dependencies are met. In contrast, TeamCity requires manual setup of build triggers and dependencies, which can be prone to errors and lead to unpredictable build outcomes.

4. **Scalability**: Concourse is designed with scalability in mind, as it can handle a large number of concurrent builds efficiently by distributing workload across multiple containers. TeamCity, while capable of scaling, may require additional configurations and resources to achieve the same level of scalability as Concourse.

5. **Community Support**: Concourse is an open-source project maintained by the community, which ensures a constant stream of updates, improvements, and plugins from the active user base. TeamCity, although feature-rich and robust, relies on JetBrains for updates and support, which may lead to a slower pace of development and lack of community-driven enhancements.

6. **Ecosystem Integration**: Concourse integrates seamlessly with cloud-native tools and technologies, making it an ideal choice for projects utilizing microservices, containers, and Kubernetes. TeamCity, while compatible with various software development tools, may require additional configuration and plugins to achieve the same level of integration with modern cloud technologies.

In Summary, Concourse and TeamCity differ in their architecture, configuration management, dependency handling, scalability, community support, and ecosystem integration, which can influence the choice of CI/CD tool for a particular project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TeamCity, Concourse

veera
veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Concourse
Concourse

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
870
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
254
Followers
1.1K
Followers
393
Votes
316
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    Github integration
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    On premise
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 2
    Proprietary
Pros
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Integrations
Slack
Slack
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Concourse?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana