Conductor vs Micro: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Conductor and Micro are both orchestration tools that help in managing and coordinating distributed services within a system. However, they differ in their architectures and functionalities. Below are the key differences between Conductor and Micro.

1. **Architecture**: Conductor follows a centralized server-client architecture where a central server coordinates the workflow tasks, while Micro is built on a decentralized architecture where each service operates independently without a central coordinator.
2. **Scalability**: Conductor is not as scalable as Micro since it relies on a single server to manage the workflow tasks, which can become a bottleneck in a large-scale system. On the other hand, Micro's decentralized architecture allows for better scalability as services can be easily replicated and distributed across multiple nodes.
3. **Service Discovery**: Micro provides built-in service discovery mechanisms, making it easier for services to discover and communicate with each other in a decentralized environment. Conductor, on the other hand, requires external tools or plugins for service discovery, adding complexity to the system.
4. **Ease of Deployment**: Micro offers a lightweight deployment process with containerization support using technologies like Docker, making it easier to deploy and manage services. Conductor, on the other hand, requires a more complex setup process due to its centralized architecture and dependencies.
5. **Flexibility**: Micro offers more flexibility in terms of language support, allowing services to be implemented in different programming languages. Conductor, on the other hand, may have limitations in language support due to its architecture and design choices.
6. **Community Support**: Micro has a more active and larger community of developers and contributors, providing better support, documentation, and resources compared to Conductor, which may have a smaller user base and community.

In Summary, Conductor and Micro differ in architecture, scalability, service discovery, ease of deployment, flexibility, and community support.