StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Service Discovery
  5. Consul vs Redis

Consul vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Consul
Consul
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.5K
Votes213
GitHub Stars29.5K
Forks4.5K
Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6

Consul vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown document provides a comparison between Consul and Redis, outlining the key differences between the two technologies.

  1. Consul Service Discovery: Consul is primarily designed as a service discovery tool, allowing services to be registered and discovered within a distributed system. It provides a DNS interface, health checks, and flexible service discovery mechanisms. Redis, on the other hand, is not specifically built for service discovery but rather as an in-memory data store and cache.

  2. Data Persistence: Redis offers data persistence through various mechanisms, including snapshots and AOF (Append-Only File). It supports both key-value pair storage and complex data structures. Consul, on the other hand, does not provide native options for data persistence. It focuses on storing and managing metadata related to service discovery and configuration.

  3. Consistency Model: Redis provides a strongly consistent data model, where updates are applied in a sequential and ordered manner. It supports atomic operations on data and ensures that the state is always consistent. Consul, on the other hand, offers eventual consistency, where updates may take some time to propagate across the system. It relies on a gossip protocol for maintaining consistency, which introduces a certain level of inconsistency during updates.

  4. Data Replication: Redis supports various replication mechanisms, including master-slave replication and Redis Cluster, allowing data to be distributed and replicated across multiple nodes. Consul, on the other hand, utilizes a strongly consistent gossip protocol for distributing metadata and maintaining consistency within the cluster.

  5. Additional Features: Redis offers a wide range of additional features, such as pub/sub messaging, Lua scripting, and transactions, making it suitable for use cases beyond data storage and caching. Consul, on the other hand, provides features like distributed key-value storage, service mesh integration, and health checking that are specifically focused on service discovery and networking.

  6. Scalability: Redis is known for its high-performance and scalability, capable of handling millions of requests per second. It can be horizontally scaled by adding more nodes to the cluster. Consul, although designed for scalability and fault-tolerance, may have limitations in terms of performance and scalability due to the additional overhead introduced by the service discovery mechanisms.

In Summary, Consul and Redis differ in their primary purpose and features. Consul focuses on service discovery and handling distributed systems, while Redis is primarily used as an in-memory data store and cache, with additional features like pub/sub messaging and transactions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Consul
Consul
Redis
Redis

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Service Discovery - Consul makes it simple for services to register themselves and to discover other services via a DNS or HTTP interface. External services such as SaaS providers can be registered as well.;Health Checking - Health Checking enables Consul to quickly alert operators about any issues in a cluster. The integration with service discovery prevents routing traffic to unhealthy hosts and enables service level circuit breakers.;Key/Value Storage - A flexible key/value store enables storing dynamic configuration, feature flagging, coordination, leader election and more. The simple HTTP API makes it easy to use anywhere.;Multi-Datacenter - Consul is built to be datacenter aware, and can support any number of regions without complex configuration.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.5K
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Forks
4.5K
GitHub Forks
6
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
61.9K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
46.5K
Votes
213
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Great service discovery infrastructure
  • 35
    Health checking
  • 29
    Distributed key-value store
  • 26
    Monitoring
  • 23
    High-availability
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL

What are some alternatives to Consul, Redis?

Eureka

Eureka

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Zookeeper

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot