CSS 3 vs Objective-C

Overview

Objective-C

Stacks13.3K

Followers6.5K

Votes490

CSS 3

Stacks90.5K

Followers53.9K

Votes0

CSS 3 vs Objective-C: What are the differences?

Sync vs Asynchronous Programming: A key difference between CSS 3 and Objective-C is how they handle programming execution. In CSS 3, the code is executed synchronously, meaning that each line of code is executed in order and must complete before moving on to the next line. On the other hand, Objective-C supports asynchronous programming, where tasks can be executed concurrently and independently without waiting for each other to finish. This allows for more efficient and parallel execution of tasks in Objective-C.
Styling and Design vs App Development: CSS 3 primarily focuses on styling and design aspects of a website, providing control over elements' appearance, layout, and visual effects. It is mainly used to define the look and feel of a website. On the other hand, Objective-C is a programming language used for app development on Apple platforms, such as iOS and macOS. It allows for the creation of interactive and functional applications with complex business logic and user interactions.
Declarative vs Procedural Programming: CSS 3 follows a declarative programming paradigm where the developer specifies what needs to be done and the browser takes care of the implementation details. In Objective-C, a procedural programming language, developers write step-by-step instructions on how to perform a certain task. This gives developers more control over the execution flow and allows for more complex logic and algorithms compared to CSS 3.
Browser Rendering vs Native Rendering: CSS 3 is primarily used for web development and is interpreted by web browsers to render the visual appearance of web pages. It relies on the browser's rendering engine to apply styles and layout. Objective-C, on the other hand, is used for native app development and allows for more direct control over the rendering process, leveraging the capabilities of the underlying operating system and device hardware.
Platform Compatibility: CSS 3 is supported by all modern web browsers and provides a consistent styling experience across different platforms and devices. It is platform-independent and can be easily applied to any HTML document. Objective-C, on the other hand, is specific to Apple platforms and is not compatible with other operating systems without modifications or additional development efforts. It is tightly integrated with Apple's frameworks and APIs.
Community and Documentation: CSS 3 has a widespread community of web designers and developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources. It is a widely adopted standard and has a strong support system. Objective-C, although still relevant in legacy codebases, has a smaller community compared to CSS 3. The documentation and resources for Objective-C may be more limited, especially when compared to more modern programming languages like Swift.

In Summary, key differences between CSS 3 and Objective-C include their execution model, focus of use, programming paradigm, rendering methods, platform compatibility, and developer community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Objective-C, CSS 3

Micky

Digital Marketer at Techy Nickk

May 23, 2020

Review

Things were very hard, before 2012 but when internet came to so many people it opens a lot ways. And now people could learn coding easily from their houses. So guys if you are a newbie who wants to learn coding with your phone then you should download these apps. Sololearn Curiosity codehub Encode

106k views106k

Comments

Mafsys

CEO at Mafsys Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

7 Awesome CSS3 Techniques You Should give a Try

Vertically Align With Flexbox Earlier developers used to face a lot of difficulties aligning a text or any other element vertically center. But now, after the introduction of the new CSS3 specification Flexbox, things have become much easier.
Responsive CSS Grid Do not make your grid an exception make it responsive too, like everything else in your design.

There are so many ways through which you can make your grid responsive with CSS Grid. And the best part of using it is, you will be able to create a more flexible grid that gives you the desired look, no matter what the device size is.

Text Animations You might have created background animations with CSS, but now it also influences how users interact and engage with the text elements of a website. From hover adjustments to making words float in the air, CCS3 has made it all possible.
Columns layout Usually, column-based layouts are created by using Javascript, which is quite complicated and time-consuming. But CSS has brought a way around to ease up the task of developers and web designers.
Screen Orientation Many people think that screen orientation and device orientation both work for the same purpose. But that’s not the case. The orientation of the screen is a bit different from the device.

Even if a device is not capable of detecting its orientation, a screen always can. And if the device is capable also, then it’s good to have control over the screen orientation so that you can maintain or change the interface of your website.

Comma Separated Lists There is no doubt that Bullet lists are very commonly used in writing to convey any information more precisely and clearly. But one thing that most people struggle with is to add commas on every point of the lists.
Animated Checkbox Well, most of the people are very much aware of the CSS background and text animations. But, not many know about checkbox animations.

Yes, apart from background and texts, you can also make your checkbox section look visually appealing. Isn’t it great? #css3 #html5 #mafsyscss3 #mafsyshtml5 #mafsystechnology #mafsystechnologies #css3techniques #css3tips #html5tips

99.1k views99.1k

Comments

Noel

Founder, CEO, CTO at NoFilter

Jun 17, 2020

Decided

1 code deploys for both: Android and iOS. There is a huge community behind React Native. And one of the best things is Expo. Expo uses React Native to make everything even more and more simple. Awesome technologies. Some other important thing is that while using React Native, you are reusing all JavaScript knowledge you have in your team. You can move easily a frontend dev to develop mobile applications.

A huge PRO of Expo, is that it includes a full building process. You run 1 line in the terminal, and 10 minutes after you have 2 builds done. Double check EAS Expo.

263k views263k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Objective-C	CSS 3
Objective-C is a superset of the C programming language and provides object-oriented capabilities and a dynamic runtime. Objective-C inherits the syntax, primitive types, and flow control statements of C and adds syntax for defining classes and methods. It also adds language-level support for object graph management and object literals while providing dynamic typing and binding, deferring many responsibilities until runtime.	CSS3 is the latest evolution of the Cascading Style Sheets language and aims at extending CSS2.1. It brings a lot of long-awaited novelties, like rounded corners, shadows, gradients, transitions or animations, as well as new layouts like multi-columns, flexible box or grid layouts. Experimental parts are vendor-prefixed and should either be avoided in production environments, or used with extreme caution as both their syntax and semantics can change in the future.
Statistics
Stacks 13.3K	Stacks 90.5K
Followers 6.5K	Followers 53.9K
Votes 490	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 212 Ios 115 Xcode 62 Backed by apple 47 Osx 40 Interface builder Cons 1 UNREADABLE	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Objective-C, CSS 3?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

CSS 3 vs Objective-C: What are the differences?

Sync vs Asynchronous Programming: A key difference between CSS 3 and Objective-C is how they handle programming execution. In CSS 3, the code is executed synchronously, meaning that each line of code is executed in order and must complete before moving on to the next line. On the other hand, Objective-C supports asynchronous programming, where tasks can be executed concurrently and independently without waiting for each other to finish. This allows for more efficient and parallel execution of tasks in Objective-C.
Styling and Design vs App Development: CSS 3 primarily focuses on styling and design aspects of a website, providing control over elements' appearance, layout, and visual effects. It is mainly used to define the look and feel of a website. On the other hand, Objective-C is a programming language used for app development on Apple platforms, such as iOS and macOS. It allows for the creation of interactive and functional applications with complex business logic and user interactions.
Declarative vs Procedural Programming: CSS 3 follows a declarative programming paradigm where the developer specifies what needs to be done and the browser takes care of the implementation details. In Objective-C, a procedural programming language, developers write step-by-step instructions on how to perform a certain task. This gives developers more control over the execution flow and allows for more complex logic and algorithms compared to CSS 3.
Browser Rendering vs Native Rendering: CSS 3 is primarily used for web development and is interpreted by web browsers to render the visual appearance of web pages. It relies on the browser's rendering engine to apply styles and layout. Objective-C, on the other hand, is used for native app development and allows for more direct control over the rendering process, leveraging the capabilities of the underlying operating system and device hardware.
Platform Compatibility: CSS 3 is supported by all modern web browsers and provides a consistent styling experience across different platforms and devices. It is platform-independent and can be easily applied to any HTML document. Objective-C, on the other hand, is specific to Apple platforms and is not compatible with other operating systems without modifications or additional development efforts. It is tightly integrated with Apple's frameworks and APIs.
Community and Documentation: CSS 3 has a widespread community of web designers and developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources. It is a widely adopted standard and has a strong support system. Objective-C, although still relevant in legacy codebases, has a smaller community compared to CSS 3. The documentation and resources for Objective-C may be more limited, especially when compared to more modern programming languages like Swift.

In Summary, key differences between CSS 3 and Objective-C include their execution model, focus of use, programming paradigm, rendering methods, platform compatibility, and developer community.

CSS 3 vs Objective-C

Overview