Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cucumber

985
927
+ 1
36
Karate DSL

146
268
+ 1
85
Add tool

Cucumber vs Karate DSL: What are the differences?

Cucumber and Karate DSL are testing frameworks that facilitate behavior-driven development (BDD) and test automation. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Syntax and Structure: Cucumber uses a Gherkin syntax, where test scenarios are written in plain English following a predefined structure using keywords such as Given, When, and Then. On the other hand, Karate DSL uses a more simplified and expressive syntax, allowing users to write tests as readable scripts without the need for additional keyword overhead.

  2. Support for API Testing: Cucumber primarily focuses on Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) for testing user scenarios, while Karate DSL extends this to include native support for API testing. Karate DSL provides comprehensive HTTP request and response handling capabilities, making it easier to perform API testing without the need for external libraries or tools.

  3. Data-Driven Testing: Cucumber provides support for data-driven testing, allowing users to execute the same test scenario with different inputs. However, Karate DSL takes this a step further by providing native support for data-driven testing along with data transformation and validation capabilities. Karate DSL allows users to define test data tables, making it easier to execute tests with multiple sets of data.

  4. Handling External Dependencies: Cucumber requires additional configuration and setup to handle external dependencies, such as starting and stopping servers or databases before and after test scenarios. Karate DSL simplifies this process by providing in-built capabilities for managing external dependencies, allowing users to define pre and post hooks to handle any required setup or teardown operations.

  5. Reporting and Debugging: Cucumber provides basic reporting capabilities, allowing users to generate HTML reports. However, Karate DSL offers more comprehensive reporting features, including detailed logs, request and response data, and test result summaries. Karate DSL also includes built-in debugging capabilities, allowing users to pause and inspect the state of the test execution.

  6. Parallel Execution: Cucumber does not provide built-in support for parallel execution of test scenarios. On the other hand, Karate DSL enables parallel execution out-of-the-box, enhancing test scalability and reducing the overall execution time.

In summary, Cucumber excels in broader BDD scenarios, fostering collaboration across teams and supporting various testing types beyond APIs. Karate DSL, with its focus on simplicity and effectiveness in API testing, is particularly well-suited for teams emphasizing API-centric development and testing.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cucumber
Pros of Karate DSL
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
  • 11
    Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI
  • 9
    Easy for even non-programmers to get started
  • 9
    Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses
  • 7
    Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources
  • 5
    Easy parameterized configuration / custom variables
  • 5
    Very fast api testing tool
  • 5
    Comprehensive documentation and examples
  • 4
    Powerful and flexible payload assertions
  • 4
    Simple, concise, readable and maintainable tests
  • 4
    Easy re-use of JSON or JS / Java logic across tests
  • 4
    IDE support - IntelliJ, Eclipse & Visual Studio Code
  • 3
    Best option for testing GraphQL
  • 3
    Java-interop so you never "hit a wall" in the framework
  • 2
    Simple yet flexible Environment Switching built-in
  • 1
    Optionally mix re-usable JavaScript logic into scripts
  • 1
    Parallel Execution with Reports Aggregated
  • 1
    Active, Responsive community on Stack Overflow
  • 1
    Re-use functional tests as performance tests
  • 1
    Super simple API mocking, within the firewall
  • 1
    XML support, not just JSON
  • 1
    Developer-friendly collaboration via standard SCM / Git
  • 1
    Rich HTML reports with HTTP logs in-line
  • 1
    Great Developer-Experience - Debug UI, HTML reports
  • 1
    Websockets support
  • 0
    Rest assured

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cucumber
Cons of Karate DSL
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b
    • 1
      Finding errors in code is not easy
    • 1
      There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
    • 1
      Karate uses its own scripting language
    • 1
      Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern
    • 1
      Confusing report: Summarized by steps and not by featur

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Cucumber?

    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

    What is Karate DSL?

    Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cucumber?
    What companies use Karate DSL?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cucumber?
    What tools integrate with Karate DSL?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cucumber and Karate DSL?
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    RSpec
    Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.
    TestNG
    It is a testing framework designed to simplify a broad range of testing needs, it covers all categories of tests: unit, functional, end-to-end, integration, etc.Run your tests in arbitrarily big thread pools with various policies available (all methods in their own thread, one thread per test class, etc.
    JUnit
    JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
    Celery
    Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
    See all alternatives