StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs Karate DSL

Cucumber vs Karate DSL

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36
Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Stacks148
Followers268
Votes85

Cucumber vs Karate DSL: What are the differences?

Cucumber and Karate DSL are testing frameworks that facilitate behavior-driven development (BDD) and test automation. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Syntax and Structure: Cucumber uses a Gherkin syntax, where test scenarios are written in plain English following a predefined structure using keywords such as Given, When, and Then. On the other hand, Karate DSL uses a more simplified and expressive syntax, allowing users to write tests as readable scripts without the need for additional keyword overhead.

  2. Support for API Testing: Cucumber primarily focuses on Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) for testing user scenarios, while Karate DSL extends this to include native support for API testing. Karate DSL provides comprehensive HTTP request and response handling capabilities, making it easier to perform API testing without the need for external libraries or tools.

  3. Data-Driven Testing: Cucumber provides support for data-driven testing, allowing users to execute the same test scenario with different inputs. However, Karate DSL takes this a step further by providing native support for data-driven testing along with data transformation and validation capabilities. Karate DSL allows users to define test data tables, making it easier to execute tests with multiple sets of data.

  4. Handling External Dependencies: Cucumber requires additional configuration and setup to handle external dependencies, such as starting and stopping servers or databases before and after test scenarios. Karate DSL simplifies this process by providing in-built capabilities for managing external dependencies, allowing users to define pre and post hooks to handle any required setup or teardown operations.

  5. Reporting and Debugging: Cucumber provides basic reporting capabilities, allowing users to generate HTML reports. However, Karate DSL offers more comprehensive reporting features, including detailed logs, request and response data, and test result summaries. Karate DSL also includes built-in debugging capabilities, allowing users to pause and inspect the state of the test execution.

  6. Parallel Execution: Cucumber does not provide built-in support for parallel execution of test scenarios. On the other hand, Karate DSL enables parallel execution out-of-the-box, enhancing test scalability and reducing the overall execution time.

In summary, Cucumber excels in broader BDD scenarios, fostering collaboration across teams and supporting various testing types beyond APIs. Karate DSL, with its focus on simplicity and effectiveness in API testing, is particularly well-suited for teams emphasizing API-centric development and testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
Karate DSL
Karate DSL

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

-
Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
148
Followers
927
Followers
268
Votes
36
Votes
85
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
Pros
  • 11
    Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI
  • 9
    Easy for even non-programmers to get started
  • 9
    Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses
  • 7
    Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources
  • 5
    Easy parameterized configuration / custom variables
Cons
  • 1
    There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
  • 1
    Finding errors in code is not easy
  • 1
    Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b
  • 1
    Confusing report: Summarized by steps and not by featur
  • 1
    Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Java
Java
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JUnit
JUnit
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, Karate DSL?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana