AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS X-Ray

65
130
+ 1
0
Datadog

9.1K
7.9K
+ 1
857
Add tool

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog: What are the differences?

AWS X-Ray, a native AWS service, focuses on providing insights into distributed applications running on the AWS infrastructure, while Datadog is a comprehensive third-party monitoring platform that supports multi-cloud environments and on-premises setups. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Integration and Platform Support: Datadog is a third-party monitoring and observability tool that can be used across different cloud platforms, including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. It supports numerous integrations with various technologies, making it versatile for different environments. On the other hand, AWS X-Ray is a native AWS service, tightly integrated with other AWS services, ensuring seamless monitoring and tracing within the AWS ecosystem.

  2. Service Focus: AWS X-Ray specifically focuses on monitoring and tracing AWS resources and distributed applications hosted on the AWS infrastructure. It provides in-depth analytics and visualizations to identify performance bottlenecks and troubleshoot issues within AWS environments. Datadog, however, takes a broader approach and offers monitoring and observability features for both cloud and on-premises infrastructures, supporting multiple cloud providers and technologies.

  3. Feature Set: AWS X-Ray mainly provides end-to-end request tracing, which allows you to trace requests as they flow through different AWS services. It helps in identifying latency, errors, and dependencies within the AWS environment. Datadog, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of monitoring tools including infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring (APM), log analytics, and synthetic monitoring. It provides a holistic view of your entire system, not limited to AWS services.

  4. Ease of Use: AWS X-Ray is tightly integrated with AWS services, making it simple to enable and use within AWS environments. It automatically captures traces and integrates with other AWS monitoring services. Datadog, being a third-party tool, requires an additional setup process for integration with different cloud platforms and services. However, it offers a user-friendly interface and intuitive dashboards for seamless navigation and analysis of monitoring data.

  5. Pricing Model: AWS X-Ray pricing is primarily based on the number of traces recorded and retrieved, with additional charges for data ingestion and data transfer. The pricing structure can be cost-effective for monitoring AWS resources. Datadog, on the other hand, follows a tiered pricing model based on the number of hosts and specific features used. It provides flexibility to choose the desired pricing plan based on your requirements and budget.

  6. Alerting and Collaboration: Datadog offers advanced alerting capabilities, allowing you to set up custom alerts based on specific metrics and thresholds. It also provides collaboration features, enabling teams to collaborate on troubleshooting and monitoring tasks. AWS X-Ray, though lacking dedicated alerting capabilities, can integrate with AWS CloudWatch alarms for basic alerting. Collaboration features within AWS X-Ray are limited compared to the extensive collaboration options provided by Datadog.

In summary, AWS X-Ray is tailored for users deeply entrenched in the AWS ecosystem, offering integrated tracing and monitoring capabilities, while Datadog stands out as a versatile, cross-cloud solution with a broader scope, encompassing logs, metrics, and APM (Application Performance Monitoring).

Advice on AWS X-Ray and Datadog
Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
Software Engineer at IVP · | 8 upvotes · 1.4M views
Needs advice
on
AppDynamicsAppDynamicsDatadogDatadog
and
DynatraceDynatrace

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

See more
Needs advice
on
DatadogDatadogNew RelicNew Relic
and
SysdigSysdig

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
DatadogDatadog

Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as

  • they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
  • easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
  • brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
  • pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)

IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.

Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!

See more
Maik Schröder
Recommends
on
InstanaInstana

Hi Medeti,

you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.

As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/

We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/

Let me know if you need anything on top.

See more
Attila Fulop
Management Advisor at artkonekt · | 2 upvotes · 311.3K views

I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.

NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup

https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/accounts/accounts-billing/new-relic-one-pricing-billing/new-relic-one-pricing-billing

I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.

See more
Decisions about AWS X-Ray and Datadog
Attila Fulop

I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.

In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.

The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:

  • The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
  • The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
  • The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
  • The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
  • The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.

Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.

See more
Benoit Larroque
Principal Engineer at Sqreen · | 4 upvotes · 409.5K views

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS X-Ray
Pros of Datadog
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 137
      Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)
    • 107
      Easy setup
    • 87
      Powerful ui
    • 83
      Powerful integrations
    • 70
      Great value
    • 54
      Great visualization
    • 46
      Events + metrics = clarity
    • 41
      Custom metrics
    • 41
      Notifications
    • 39
      Flexibility
    • 19
      Free & paid plans
    • 16
      Great customer support
    • 15
      Makes my life easier
    • 10
      Adapts automatically as i scale up
    • 9
      Easy setup and plugins
    • 8
      Super easy and powerful
    • 7
      AWS support
    • 7
      In-context collaboration
    • 6
      Rich in features
    • 5
      Docker support
    • 4
      Cost
    • 4
      Source control and bug tracking
    • 4
      Automation tools
    • 4
      Cute logo
    • 4
      Monitor almost everything
    • 4
      Full visibility of applications
    • 4
      Simple, powerful, great for infra
    • 4
      Easy to Analyze
    • 4
      Best than others
    • 3
      Expensive
    • 3
      Best in the field
    • 3
      Free setup
    • 3
      Good for Startups
    • 2
      APM

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of AWS X-Ray
    Cons of Datadog
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 19
        Expensive
      • 4
        No errors exception tracking
      • 2
        External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging
      • 1
        Complicated

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      No Stats

      What is AWS X-Ray?

      It helps developers analyze and debug production, distributed applications, such as those built using a microservices architecture. With this, you can understand how your application and its underlying services are performing to identify and troubleshoot the root cause of performance issues and errors. It provides an end-to-end view of requests as they travel through your application, and shows a map of your application’s underlying components.

      What is Datadog?

      Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use AWS X-Ray?
      What companies use Datadog?
      See which teams inside your own company are using AWS X-Ray or Datadog.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with AWS X-Ray?
      What tools integrate with Datadog?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      GitHubGitPython+22
      17
      14208
      GitHubGitDocker+34
      29
      42436
      GitHubPythonNode.js+26
      29
      15957
      GitHubMySQLSlack+44
      109
      50664
      What are some alternatives to AWS X-Ray and Datadog?
      New Relic
      The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.
      Dynatrace
      It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.
      AppDynamics
      AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.
      Jaeger
      Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System
      Splunk
      It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.
      See all alternatives