Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

IBM DB2

245
252
+ 1
19
FoundationDB

33
79
+ 1
21
Add tool

FoundationDB vs IBM DB2: What are the differences?

Introduction:

FoundationDB and IBM DB2 are two databases used in different contexts and have their own set of unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between the two can help users make informed decisions when choosing the right database system for their specific needs.

1. Architecture: FoundationDB is designed as a distributed, multi-model database that provides ACID transactions across multiple layers. On the other hand, IBM DB2 is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that follows the traditional relational model, offering features like SQL querying and schema management.

2. Scalability: FoundationDB is known for its scalability capabilities, as it can scale horizontally with ease by adding more nodes to the cluster. IBM DB2, although it supports some level of scalability, may face challenges in scaling out to handle large workloads efficiently.

3. Consistency Model: FoundationDB follows a strict global ACID consistency model to ensure data integrity, which is crucial for mission-critical applications. In contrast, IBM DB2 offers different isolation levels, allowing users to choose between consistency and performance based on their requirements.

4. Data Modeling: FoundationDB offers a flexible data model that supports document-oriented, key-value, and relational data storage. IBM DB2, being a relational database, focuses primarily on tabular data storage with robust support for SQL queries and relational schema management.

5. Open Source vs. Proprietary: FoundationDB is an open-source database system that is free to use, modify, and distribute, making it ideal for developers looking for an affordable and customizable solution. On the other hand, IBM DB2 is a proprietary database system that comes with licensing fees, support packages, and limited customization options.

6. Ecosystem and Support: FoundationDB has a growing community and ecosystem that contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and community-driven resources. In contrast, IBM DB2 has been in the market for a long time, offering extensive support, training, and enterprise-grade solutions for organizations with complex data management needs.

In Summary, FoundationDB and IBM DB2 differ in their architecture, scalability, consistency model, data modeling approach, licensing, and support ecosystem, catering to different use cases and preferences in the database management landscape.

Decisions about IBM DB2 and FoundationDB
Karan Kaushik
Senior Software Developer at Shyplite · | 5 upvotes · 38.5K views

So, we started using foundationDB for an OLAP system although the inbuilt tools for some core things like aggregation and filtering were negligible, with the high through put of the DB, we were able to handle it on the application. The system has been running pretty well for the past 6 months, although the data load isn’t very high yet, the performance is fairly promising

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of IBM DB2
Pros of FoundationDB
  • 7
    Rock solid and very scalable
  • 5
    BLU Analytics is amazingly fast
  • 2
    Native XML support
  • 2
    Secure by default
  • 2
    Easy
  • 1
    Best performance
  • 6
    ACID transactions
  • 5
    Linear scalability
  • 3
    Multi-model database
  • 3
    Key-Value Store
  • 3
    Great Foundation
  • 1
    SQL Layer

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is IBM DB2?

DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is optimized to deliver industry-leading performance across multiple workloads, while lowering administration, storage, development, and server costs.

What is FoundationDB?

FoundationDB is a NoSQL database with a shared nothing architecture. Designed around a "core" ordered key-value database, additional features and data models are supplied in layers. The key-value database, as well as all layers, supports full, cross-key and cross-server ACID transactions.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use IBM DB2?
What companies use FoundationDB?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with IBM DB2?
What tools integrate with FoundationDB?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to IBM DB2 and FoundationDB?
    Oracle
    Oracle Database is an RDBMS. An RDBMS that implements object-oriented features such as user-defined types, inheritance, and polymorphism is called an object-relational database management system (ORDBMS). Oracle Database has extended the relational model to an object-relational model, making it possible to store complex business models in a relational database.
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    Microsoft SQL Server
    Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.
    See all alternatives