Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
DC/OS vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Introduction
DC/OS (Distributed Cloud Operating System) and Kubernetes are both popular container orchestration platforms used to manage and deploy applications at scale. While both platforms share similarities in their ability to automate container operations, there are key differences that set them apart.
Architecture: DC/OS is built on a distributed system architecture, providing a unified platform for deploying and managing services across multiple nodes in a cluster. Kubernetes, on the other hand, follows a master-worker architecture, where the master node manages the cluster and assigns tasks to worker nodes. This architectural difference can impact the scalability and fault tolerance capabilities of each platform.
Ecosystem: DC/OS offers an integrated ecosystem of services, including a package manager for simplified software installation and a rich set of built-in tools. Kubernetes, on the other hand, focuses on providing a flexible platform with a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be integrated into the ecosystem. The choice between the two platforms depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the users.
Networking: DC/OS uses its own proprietary network overlay technology called Virtual Network System (VNS), which allows for seamless communication between containerized applications. Kubernetes, on the other hand, relies on software-defined networking (SDN) solutions like Calico or Flannel to provide network connectivity between containers. The choice of networking solution can impact the performance and security of container communication.
Community support: Kubernetes has a large and active community of contributors and users, which has led to a significant growth in its ecosystem and availability of resources. DC/OS, although also supported by a community, may have a smaller user base and a more limited set of resources compared to Kubernetes. Consideration should be given to the availability of support and resources when choosing between the two platforms.
Application focus: DC/OS is designed to support a wide range of applications, including both stateless and stateful workloads, and provides features like persistent storage and multi-tenancy. Kubernetes, on the other hand, is primarily focused on stateless applications and provides features like auto-scaling and self-healing for application deployment. The application focus of each platform should align with the specific needs of the workload being deployed.
In summary, DC/OS and Kubernetes are both powerful container orchestration platforms with different architectural approaches, ecosystem offerings, networking options, community support, and application focuses. The choice between the two depends on factors such as desired architecture, available resources, networking requirements, and the nature of the applications being deployed.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of DC/OS
- Easy to setup a HA cluster5
- Open source3
- Has templates to install via AWS and Azure2
- Easy Setup1
- Easy to get services running and operate them1
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of DC/OS
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1