StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. UI Components
  5. DevExtreme vs jQWidgets

DevExtreme vs jQWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DevExtreme
DevExtreme
Stacks107
Followers205
Votes1
GitHub Stars1.9K
Forks655
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

DevExtreme vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between DevExtreme and jQWidgets, focusing on their features, capabilities, and compatibility.

  1. Data Binding: DevExtreme offers a comprehensive data binding mechanism that allows developers to seamlessly bind data from various sources, including RESTful API services, to their UI components. On the other hand, jQWidgets provides similar data binding capabilities but with a more limited range of data sources.

  2. UI Component Library: DevExtreme provides a vast collection of highly customizable UI components like grids, charts, calendars, and more. These components are designed to offer a rich and intuitive user experience. In contrast, jQWidgets also offers a wide range of UI components, but the collection may be less extensive compared to DevExtreme.

  3. Responsive Design: DevExtreme is built with responsive design in mind, ensuring that the UI components can adapt and smoothly adjust to different screen sizes and form factors. This allows applications developed with DevExtreme to provide a consistent user experience across devices. Although jQWidgets also supports responsive design to some extent, it may require additional effort and customization.

  4. Mobile Support: DevExtreme comes with native mobile support, enabling developers to create cross-platform mobile applications using a single codebase. It provides essential mobile-specific features like touch gestures, adaptive layout, and native-like performance. jQWidgets, on the other hand, primarily focuses on web application development and may require additional frameworks or libraries for mobile support.

  5. Documentation and Community Support: DevExtreme provides comprehensive documentation, including detailed API references, step-by-step tutorials, and sample projects. It also has an active and engaged community that offers support and shares knowledge. jQWidgets also provides documentation and a support forum, but the level of detail and community engagement may vary.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: DevExtreme follows a commercial licensing model, which means developers need to purchase a license to use it in commercial projects. It offers different pricing options based on the number of developers and deployment requirements. jQWidgets also offers commercial licenses but also provides a limited Community Edition with fewer features that can be used for non-commercial projects.

In summary, DevExtreme and jQWidgets are both powerful UI component libraries, but DevExtreme offers a more extensive collection of components, native mobile support, and comprehensive documentation. jQWidgets, on the other hand, provides a more cost-effective solution with a limited range of components and may require additional effort for mobile support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DevExtreme
DevExtreme
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

From Angular and React, to ASP.NET Core or Vue, it includes a comprehensive collection of high-performance and responsive UI widgets for use in traditional web and next-gen mobile applications. The suite ships with a feature-complete data grid, interactive charts widgets, data editors, and much more.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

A Feature-Complete HTML5 JavaScript Data Grid Widget; Client-Side Widget Optimized for Multi-Dimensional Data Analysis;Collection of High-Performance Data Visualization Widgets;Client-Side Tree View and List View Hybrid;Google, Bing, and Vector Maps
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.9K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
655
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
107
Stacks
14
Followers
205
Followers
49
Votes
1
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Components
Cons
  • 4
    Large transfer size
  • 1
    Customisation
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
Ionic
Ionic
AngularJS
AngularJS
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
Angular
Angular
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
jQuery
jQuery
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to DevExtreme, jQWidgets?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase