StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Virtual Machine Platforms And Containers
  5. Docker vs Flocker

Docker vs Flocker

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K
Flocker
Flocker
Stacks12
Followers59
Votes15
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks288

Docker vs Flocker: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker and Flocker are both technologies used in the field of containerization. While Docker focuses on creating and managing isolated containers, Flocker aims to enable the portability and data persistence of containers.

  1. Portability: Docker provides a highly portable environment by packaging applications and their dependencies into containers. These containers can be run on any system that supports Docker, making it easy to deploy applications across different environments. On the other hand, Flocker goes beyond container portability by allowing the movement of containers along with their associated data across different hosts or clusters.

  2. Data Management: Docker containers are designed to be stateless, meaning they do not store data persistently. Flocker, however, addresses this limitation by providing container-level data management. It allows data volumes to be moved and associated with containers, ensuring data persistence and availability even when containers are moved to different hosts.

  3. Scalability: Docker's focus is on container orchestration and management, making it highly scalable. It provides features like automatic scaling, load balancing, and service discovery. Flocker, on the other hand, primarily focuses on data management and portability, and does not offer built-in scalability features. However, Flocker can be used in conjunction with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes to achieve scalability.

  4. Multi-Host Support: Docker primarily operates on a single host, with containers running independently on that host. Flocker, in contrast, supports multi-host deployments and allows the movement of containers and their associated data across different hosts or clusters. This enables distributed applications and data to be managed effectively.

  5. Data Consistency: Docker containers are typically isolated from each other and do not share a common data source. Flocker provides a mechanism for managing data consistency across containers by enabling the movement of data volumes along with the containers. This ensures that containers always have access to the latest and consistent data.

  6. Use Cases: Docker is widely used for application development, deployment, and scaling. It is commonly used by developers to package their applications and dependencies into containers for easy distribution and deployment. Flocker, on the other hand, is primarily used in scenarios where data persistence and portability are critical, such as database clusters and stateful applications.

In summary, Docker focuses on providing a highly portable and scalable environment for containerized applications, while Flocker emphasizes on data persistence and portability across hosts or clusters.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Docker, Flocker

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker
Docker
Flocker
Flocker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
Move containers and their data together between hosts Run multiple containers on multiple machines Define your application as a set of connected containers Easily move between dev, staging and production
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
288
Stacks
194.2K
Stacks
12
Followers
143.8K
Followers
59
Votes
3.9K
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Pros
  • 4
    Open-Source
  • 3
    Easily manage Docker containers with Data
  • 2
    Only requires docker
  • 2
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 2
    Easy setup
Integrations
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS
Mesosphere
Mesosphere
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
CoreOS
CoreOS

What are some alternatives to Docker, Flocker?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana